Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday September 04 2019, @07:31AM   Printer-friendly

About a week ago, the 18th Space Control Squadron, US Air Force, relayed warning data to the European Space Agency.

The data indicated that there was a non-negligible collision risk between ESA's Aeolus satellite and Starlink44, an active SpaceX satellite, at 11:02 UTC on Monday, 2 September.

As days passed, the probability of collision continued to increase, and by Wednesday, August 28, ESA's Ops team decided to reach out to Starlink to discuss their options. Within a day, the Starlink team informed ESA that they had no plan to take action at that point. By Thursday evening, ESA's probability threshold for conducting an avoidance manoeuvre had been reached, and preparations were made to lift Aeolus 350 meter in orbit. By Sunday evening, chances of a collision had risen to 1 in 1000, and commands were sent to the Aeolus satellite, which triggered a total of 3 thruster burns on Monday morning, half an orbit before the potential collision. About half an hour after the collision prediction time, Aeolus contacted base, and normal measurement operations could continue.

What the SpaceX satellite was doing in ESA's Aeolus orbit is not clear.

ESA has taken the opportunity to point out that, given SpaceX plans to put up 20,000 of those things, handling monitoring and avoidance semi-manually, and by mail, is no longer practical.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by black6host on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:16AM (2 children)

    by black6host (3827) on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:16AM (#889426) Journal

    I wonder what would have happened if avoidance steps had not been taken. I read both articles but didn't see mention of that. Would a collision have occurred?

    Would have been a bummer if they moved the sat up 350 meters only to put it in the path of another Muskellite :)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:41AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:41AM (#889438)

    The chance of collision for this case is roughly 1:1700, so it's not that likely to happen. However it's already much higher then the threshold (1:10000) to take avoidance action.

  • (Score: 1, Troll) by The Shire on Wednesday September 04 2019, @06:29PM

    by The Shire (5824) on Wednesday September 04 2019, @06:29PM (#889624)

    The Air Force estimated they could have come as close as 2km to each other. That's too close when you're operating a satellite but there was never any real danger of a collision. They were frankly in separate and distinct orbits that happen to put the satellites in proximity.