Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday September 06 2019, @06:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the Ajit-Strikes-Again dept.

In May 2019, Neil Jacobs, the acting head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), testified before Capitol Hill that 5G wireless signals could decrease forecasting accuracy by 30 percent.

"This would degrade the forecast skill by up to 30%. If you look back in time to see when our forecast skill was roughly 30% less than it was today, it's somewhere around 1980," Jacobs said in May. "This would result in the reduction of hurricane track[ing] forecasts' lead time by roughly two to three days." A delay of two to three days could have a catastrophic effect on human life.

Still, these warnings haven't swayed regulators nor the cell phone industry. In August, Sprint announced more cities would be added to its 5G rollout plan. AT&T already has 5G available to corporate customers in various cities. Verizon already offers 5G to customers and has plans to expand, too.

"Right now the uncertainty is to what extent there will be an interference," he added. "In some sense the cause for education is to make sure that the existing weather sensing bands are protected and that 5G is in areas that are far enough away from where present weather sensors exist."

This does not mean 5G can't exist in states like Florida, but that the power might have to be turned down.

"If the power is turned down, there is a lesser likelihood that water satellites (that will sense the atmosphere) will sense the 5G network" instead, Gerth said.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai has been dismissive of these concerns, which are only one of several in regards to 5G. As several experts told Salon last year, the effects of widespread use of mobile 5G need to be better-studied before it goes mainstream.

Why study when you can profit instead?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 07 2019, @12:21AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 07 2019, @12:21AM (#890778)

    In other words, he's too stupid to understand what he's been told, or more likely won't listen to what the experts are telling him about it because he doesn't have the capacity to understand it. Or he listened to an advisor (and almost certainly not a subject matter expert) who told him Alabama might be a possibility and "we did good there...."

    Any attempt at justifying that is simply making excuses for Trump's stupidity or failures as a leader. I don't care how he justified it. And I care far more about his not being able to admit he's wrong. That has a much higher capacity for being deadly for a whole lot more people than just himself or his staff whether that's civilians escaping a hurricane or soldiers he sends into harms way based on fucked up data he can't admit he misunderstood.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Offtopic=1, Flamebait=1, Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 07 2019, @02:17PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 07 2019, @02:17PM (#890975)

    He probably mis-understood the XTRP model.