Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday September 08 2019, @10:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the Who-do-YOU-trust? dept.

Firefox is enabling DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) for some users starting this month, and it will use Cloudflare by default:

DoH (IETF RFC8484) allows Firefox to send DNS requests as normal-looking HTTPS traffic to special DoH-compatible DNS servers (called DoH resolvers). Basically, it hides DNS requests inside the normal deluge of HTTPS data. [DoH doesn't encrypt DNS requests. That's a different protocol, namely DNS-over-TLS, aka DoT].

By default, Firefox ships with support for relaying encrypted DoH requests via Cloudflare's DoH resolver, but users can change it to any DoH resolver they want [see here].

When DoH support is enabled in Firefox, the browser will ignore DNS settings set in the operating system, and use the browser-set DoH resolver. By moving DNS server settings from the OS to the browser level, and by encrypting the DNS traffic, DoH effectively hides DNS traffic from internet service providers (ISPs), local parental control software, antivirus software, enterprise firewalls and traffic filters, and about any other third-party that tries to intercept and sniff a user's traffic.

Firefox Plans Controversial New Encryption Setting For Millions, And Update Starts This Month

A presentation from BT on the "Potential ISP Challenges with DNS over HTTPS" earlier this year warned that DoH will reduce the ability to derive cybersecurity intelligence from malware activity and DNS insight, open new attack opportunities to hackers, and result in an inability to [fulfill] government mandated regulation or court orders as potential concerns. And so the change will foster serious debate. [...] The U.S. is first, but the rest of the world will follow. A spokesperson for the U.K. Internet Services Providers' Association told me that "the debate on DNS over HTTPS (DoH) is evidently a topic that polarizes opinion. However, our position is clear. ISPA believes that bringing in DoH by default would be harmful for online safety, cyber security and consumer choice."

DNS-over-HTTPS is the next default protection coming to Firefox

Mozilla will be rolling out DoH in what it calls "fallback mode" later this month. This means that if domain name look-ups using DoH fail, Firefox will revert back to using the default operating system DNS. Similarly, if Firefox detects that parental controls or enterprise policies are in effect, Firefox will disable DoH.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 08 2019, @10:51PM (11 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 08 2019, @10:51PM (#891435)

    My DNS already filter out 18,000 sites. I do not want tracking sites and crap pages that Mozilla will allow to work again.

    What is Mozilla doing??? Being the Google? or the Facebook?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by c0lo on Sunday September 08 2019, @11:12PM (9 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday September 08 2019, @11:12PM (#891441) Journal

    I do not want tracking sites and crap pages that Mozilla will allow to work again.

    Then disable it [mozilla.org], you can still do it ATM (or should I say: "while you can"?).

    This is not to say that the potential of evil isn't there or is benign:

    In July, a UK ISP named Mozilla an "internet villain" for adding DoH support to Firefox. The ISP argued that they couldn't filter traffic for child abuse sites because DoH would allow users to bypass any filters it put in place.

    The ISP later recanted on calling Mozilla an internet villain after a massive public backlash, and Mozilla announced it would not enable DoH support by default for Firefox users in the UK.

    Companies that provide enterprise traffic filtering solutions have also criticized the protocol, which they said can act as a firewall bypassing mechanism.
    ...
    Additionally, Mozilla is also working with ISPs to make sure users won't use DoH as a way to bypass legally-set blocklists.

    ---

    A case of mixed blessing and curse:
    1. on one side, the potential of by-passing the ISP-imposed blocks is... ummm.... fine for the moment
    2. on the other side, I do hope they will maintain the capability to pick a user custom DoH provider [mozilla.org] and write-enabled access for the exception list [mozilla.org] for the future. The "Note: Do not remove any domains from the list." in the latest link is a bit worrisome.

    Overall, I'm a bit pessimistic on the future: looks like the trend seems to increase the control over the fundamental technologies of the Internet-as-we-know-it.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 08 2019, @11:51PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 08 2019, @11:51PM (#891455)

      An UK ISP implementing UK censorship scheme throwing a fit over this, is natural. You singing along is strange, to say the least.

      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 09 2019, @12:16AM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 09 2019, @12:16AM (#891462) Journal

        You singing along is strange, to say the least.

        What exactly made you say that? I don't think anything inside my post says "I sing along with that".
        Maybe because I used a double negation? (the "not to say that the potential of evil isn't there"? As in "I'm implying that there may be evil in the future", 'cause ATM one still has enough control to get around).

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 09 2019, @02:29AM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 09 2019, @02:29AM (#891504)

      What do you mean "while you still can"? You have the source, don't you?

      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 09 2019, @02:40AM (2 children)

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 09 2019, @02:40AM (#891508) Journal

        Having the source is inconsequential if the remote support the source relies on (the classical DNS) is declared deprecated and/or illegal and/or, no matter the reasons, is replaced by something else and stops functioning.
        (the RFC-es aren't quite natural laws)

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 09 2019, @04:49AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 09 2019, @04:49AM (#891547)

          I think we're quite far away from giving up on DNS.

          • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 09 2019, @05:00AM

            by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 09 2019, @05:00AM (#891552) Journal

            I think we're quite far away from giving up on DNS.

            Time will tell. But, yes, some solutions [wikipedia.org] seems to exist [wikipedia.org].

            --
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Monday September 09 2019, @03:57AM (1 child)

      by deimtee (3272) on Monday September 09 2019, @03:57AM (#891531) Journal

      The "Note: Do not remove any domains from the list." in the latest link is a bit worrisome.

      Not that worrying. The only ones in there are localhost and local.

      --
      If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 09 2019, @04:22AM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 09 2019, @04:22AM (#891541) Journal

        The only ones in there are localhost and local.

        ... for now.

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 2) by Mer on Monday September 09 2019, @07:43PM

      by Mer (8009) on Monday September 09 2019, @07:43PM (#891841)

      It's good if it gives an incentive for openDNS and other good DNS services to roll out a DoH version.
      Better browsers would implement DoH. And then even if Mozilla gimps the censorship bypassing to uselessness you're fine.

      --
      Shut up!, he explained.
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Tuesday September 10 2019, @09:47PM

    by Bot (3902) on Tuesday September 10 2019, @09:47PM (#892397) Journal

    >What is Mozilla doing??? Being the Google? or the Facebook?

    let me compute... reimplementing standards... no one asked for... now everybody has to adapt...

    it's being the systemd.

    --
    Account abandoned.