Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday September 09 2019, @12:40PM   Printer-friendly
from the got-to-start-somewhere dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Verizon yesterday announced that its 5G service is available in 13 NFL stadiums but said the network is only able to cover "parts" of the seating areas. Verizon 5G signals will also be sparse or non-existent when fans walk through concourses and other areas in and around each stadium.

The rollout of 5G is more complicated than the rollout of 4G was because 5G relies heavily on millimeter-wave signals that don't travel far and are easily blocked by walls and other obstacles. While Verizon is trying to build excitement around 5G, its announcement for availability in NFL stadiums carried several caveats.

"Verizon 5G Ultra Wideband service will be available in areas of the [13] stadiums," Verizon said. "Service will be concentrated in parts of the seating areas but could be available in other locations in and around the stadium as well."

Notice the phrase "could be available" in that last sentence. Verizon isn't promising any 5G coverage outside the seating areas, and the seating-area coverage will only be available in some sections.

[...] 5G can work on any frequency used by mobile networks, including the lower-band frequencies Verizon uses for its nationwide 4G network. But Verizon has said that customers will only notice small speed increases on 5G when it's delivered over low-band frequencies. The big speed increases will come on millimeter-wave deployments, which will be concentrated in densely populated areas.

The 13 stadiums where Verizon 5G is partially available include those used by the Carolina Panthers, Denver Broncos, Seattle Seahawks, Detroit Lions, New England Patriots, Miami Dolphins, Indianapolis Colts, New York Giants and New York Jets (they share a stadium in New Jersey), Baltimore Ravens, Houston Texans, Chicago Bears, and Minnesota Vikings. That's only 12 stadiums, so there's a 13th that Verizon hasn't revealed. There are another 18 other NFL stadiums without Verizon 5G service.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday September 09 2019, @01:14PM (12 children)

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Monday September 09 2019, @01:14PM (#891663) Homepage Journal

    The faster the speed, the less penetration of solid objects you get. 2.6GHz has passable but not good solid object penetration and 5GHz has shitty penetration 802.11ad at 60GHZ? Yeah, pretty cocktastic penetration; basically nothing more signal-blocking than your clothes will get passed through at all.

    Now go over to "millimeter-wave" 5g and you're talking a range of around 30-300GHZ. Fast as fuck for data transfer but unlikely to even penetrate thin cardboard at the high end. Antenna placement within your phone had to be a pretty big issue because your hand will be more than enough to block signal entirely if you hold it in a manner the designers hadn't anticipated.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Informative=1, Touché=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday September 09 2019, @01:21PM (4 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday September 09 2019, @01:21PM (#891669) Journal

    "Verizon 5G Ultra Wideband service will be available in areas of the [13] stadiums," Verizon said. "Service will be concentrated in parts of the seating areas but could be available in other locations in and around the stadium as well."

    Notice the phrase "could be available" in that last sentence. Verizon isn't promising any 5G coverage outside the seating areas, and the seating-area coverage will only be available in some sections.

    Their response seems fine to me. If they want to offer more coverage, they'll put more "nanocells" near the concessions stands, bathrooms, or whatever.

    Heaven forbid you drop back to 4G.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday September 09 2019, @04:10PM

      by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Monday September 09 2019, @04:10PM (#891729) Homepage Journal

      The stands? The only viable place, since it's essentially line-of-sight-only what with the people sitting in front of or behind you able to completely block the signal, to put it would be almost directly overhead. That's all fine and good for domes but completely useless for open stadiums.

      As usual, if an ethernet cord is at all a viable option, it is the best option by a damned sight.

      --
      My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday September 10 2019, @04:04AM (2 children)

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday September 10 2019, @04:04AM (#892060) Homepage
      Yup, more nanocells, and perhaps finally we can begin the mass cohort studies we need to ascertain the safety of these mm waves. Happy to see tens of thousands of volunteers for the pilot studies.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by takyon on Monday September 09 2019, @02:22PM (3 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday September 09 2019, @02:22PM (#891690) Journal

    5G also has sub-5GHz, sub-1GHz, MU-MIMO and beamforming:

    https://www.qualcomm.com/news/onq/2019/06/20/how-5g-massive-mimo-transforms-your-mobile-experiences [qualcomm.com]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G_NR_frequency_bands [wikipedia.org]

    Frequency bands for 5G NR are being separated into two different frequency ranges. First there is Frequency Range 1 (FR1) that includes sub-6GHz frequency bands, some of which are bands traditionally used by previous standards, but has been extended to cover potential new spectrum offerings from 410 MHz to 7125 MHz. The other is Frequency Range 2 (FR2) that includes frequency bands from 24.25 GHz to 52.6 GHz. Bands in this millimeter wave range have shorter range but higher available bandwidth than bands in the FR1.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 09 2019, @03:24PM (2 children)

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday September 09 2019, @03:24PM (#891710)

      All the tricks... does it also transfer data via audio-modem when RF interference is too high?

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]
      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday September 09 2019, @03:32PM (1 child)

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday September 09 2019, @03:32PM (#891715) Journal

        Only when the FBI, CIA, NSA, etc. want it to.

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
        • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday September 09 2019, @03:52PM

          by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday September 09 2019, @03:52PM (#891723)

          There are covert systems to monitor data transfer via audio signatures of electronic equipment- they can tell more than you might imagine from the patterns of the whine...

          --
          🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by Freeman on Monday September 09 2019, @03:34PM (2 children)

    by Freeman (732) on Monday September 09 2019, @03:34PM (#891717) Journal

    So, quite literally, "you're holding it wrong".

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 09 2019, @08:35PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 09 2019, @08:35PM (#891854)

      But, thanks to bluetooth, you don't hold the phone anymore, you leave it in your pocket/purse/whatever ... so now "whatever" just needs to be an aerial mount to hold your phone up where reception is good, and no more problems.

      • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Tuesday September 10 2019, @02:15PM

        by Freeman (732) on Tuesday September 10 2019, @02:15PM (#892212) Journal

        Then, excuse me for wanting to hold my phone at all.

        --
        Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"