Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday September 12 2019, @04:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the alcohol-fuels-innovation dept.

How Prohibition Tossed a Wet Blanket on America’s Inventors

New research reveals the link between bars and new inventions.

In Silicon Valley, it’s only a six-mile drive from the Googleplex to Facebook HQ. In Manhattan, Madison Avenue has long been lined with renowned advertising firms. And in San Francisco, the city’s best burrito joints are clustered in the Mission District.

A few years ago, Mike Andrews became interested in this human geography—the way that innovation and invention emerge from specific places. This phenomenon of the best coders, ad men, and burrito chefs clustering together interests everyone from economists to sociologists.

[...] “If you press economists on this when they’re giving talks, and ask why it matters that everyone’s in the same city or within a few blocks, they’ll say something like, ‘People get together and talk at the bar,’” says Andrews. “I’ve actually heard this multiple times. [But] I don’t think direct evidence of that has ever existed before.”

So, during his PhD days, Andrews came up with the idea of finding that evidence. He’d do it by looking at that time the United States shuttered all its bars overnight: Prohibition.

[...] The result? A 15 percent decrease in the number of patents. The areas whose saloons shuttered had become less inventive.

[...] A careful researcher, Andrews road-tested his theory and results. He looked at patents received by women, who were generally unwelcome in pubs and taverns at the time, after local laws against alcohol went into effect. As expected, the decline was much smaller for female inventors. Similarly, he looked at serial inventors, who often worked for companies and might be more inspired by in-office conversation and collaboration. They too were less affected by prohibition.

It's a good thing patents are a direct measure of true innovation.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by The Shire on Thursday September 12 2019, @08:45AM (2 children)

    by The Shire (5824) on Thursday September 12 2019, @08:45AM (#893092)

    It's a common mistake people make. These anecdotal tales are pure conjecture. By his own admission, 85% of all innovation at the time was unaffected. If anything it contradicts the hypothesis that proximity in the same city is a major factor. And this "careful researcher" does not appear to have spent any time looking at other factors behind the modest 15% drop such as if the amount of venture capital had decreased during that period.

    Pure conjecture.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 12 2019, @09:40AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 12 2019, @09:40AM (#893098)

    Sure, just like stalin and mao redistributed the farmland, then hundreds of millions of people died due to famine. Correlation isn't causation, some people just couldn't get used to their new low calorie diet.

  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday September 12 2019, @12:18PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday September 12 2019, @12:18PM (#893130)

    Pure conjecture.

    And, missing the point. Speakeasys were much more private, and engaging, and when at a speakeasy there were more entertaining things to do than just invent something and get a patent. Patents are for respectable people who go out in public.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]