Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday September 16 2019, @07:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the putting-a-brave-face-on-it dept.

Time is running out for engineers from the Indian space program to establish contact with the troubled Chandrayaan-2 lunar lander.

[...] Communications were lost with the lander during this time and have not been re-established since.

Officials at the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) were able to locate the lander on the moon last week, and they have been trying to re-establish communications with the hope of saving either the Vikram lander or the Pragyan rover inside it. There is a time window they need to consider, however. The lander and rover were both designed to last for one lunar day, which is the equivalent of 14 days here on Earth. With a week passed since the landing date, the ISRO engineers have only one more week to get in contact with the lander before it runs out of power.

Source: https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/india-lunar-lander-time/

From www.space.com

[...] ISRO officials have not yet released the Chandrayaan-2 image of Vikram on the lunar surface or described the potential condition of the lander. But they have said that despite the lander's presumed failed moon landing, the craft has already demonstrated key technologies for future missions.

"The Vikram Lander followed the planned descent trajectory from its orbit of 35 km (22 miles) to just below 2 km above the surface," ISRO officials wrote in an update Saturday (Sept. 7). "All the systems and sensors of the Lander functioned excellently until this point and proved many new technologies such as variable thrust propulsion technology used in the Lander."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Monday September 16 2019, @02:27PM (5 children)

    by Freeman (732) on Monday September 16 2019, @02:27PM (#894603) Journal

    Yep, it's still hard. Cool, that they were able to prove some new technology, but the main mission seems to have ended in a nice crater or something.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @02:46PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @02:46PM (#894609)

    This is just a prestige failure. It looks like the orbiting satellite will gather orders of magnitude more scientific data.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @02:51PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @02:51PM (#894612)

    Yeah, I have to think that they are just doing what they do in IT projects, too. Don't ever admit there is a problem, because if there is still 5 minutes left before the deadline, it can be claimed that the team is still working on it and experts are reviewing the issue.

    It broke. They haven't wanted to publically admit that their landing was not the success they anticipated.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @04:23PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @04:23PM (#894668)

    The LAN cable between the orbiter and impacter wasn't long enough.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @05:01PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @05:01PM (#894684)

      Did their impactor hang low?
      Could we swing it to and fro?
      Could we tie it in a knot? Could we tie it in a bow?
      Can you throw it over the orbiter, like a lunar conservator?

      Does your impactor hang low?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @11:28PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 16 2019, @11:28PM (#894880)

    It took the US Ranger probe series 7 tries to work right in the mid 1960's.

    People were wondering if a manned landing was even possible given all the problems they were encountering trying to to get a simple non-landing reconnaissance probe to work. It's like, "How can we make an oven when our toaster won't even work after 6 tries!"