Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday September 17 2019, @05:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the resign:-to-sign-and-sign-again? dept.

Richard M. Stallman Resigns as FSF President and from its Board of Directors

https://www.fsf.org/news/richard-m-stallman-resigns (emphasis from original retained):

On September 16, 2019, Richard M. Stallman, founder and president of
the Free Software Foundation, resigned as president and from its board
of directors.

The board will be conducting a search for a new president, beginning
immediately. Further details of the search will be published on
fsf.org.

For questions, contact FSF executive director John Sullivan at
johns@fsf.org.

Copyright © 2004-2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Privacy Policy.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 license (or later version)Why this license?

Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Resigns from MIT Over Epstein Comments

Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Resigns From MIT Over Epstein Comments

Famed free software advocate and computer scientist Richard Stallman has resigned from MIT, according to an email he published online. The resignation comes after Stallman made comments about victims of child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, including that the victims went along with the abuse willingly.

"I am resigning effective immediately from my position in CSAIL at MIT," Stallman wrote in the email, referring to MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. "I am doing this due to pressure on MIT and me over a series of misunderstandings and mischaracterizations."

[...] Last week, Motherboard published the full email thread in which Stallman wrote that the "most plausible scenario" is that Epstein's underage victims in his campaign of trafficking were "entirely willing." Stallman also argued about the definition of "rape" and whether the term applies to the victims.

[Ed.'s note - just because Vice say things in the above blockquote does not mean that SoylentNews or its editors consider it a demonstrably provable representation of reality. We're just reporting that they are reporting, nothing more. At least this Ed. finds out-of-context quoting of short inflamatory phrases to be particularly disingenuous, and perhaps even a warning sign that manipulation of a quote has taking place. -- FP.]


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by chromas on Tuesday September 17 2019, @08:04AM (8 children)

    by chromas (34) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday September 17 2019, @08:04AM (#895066) Journal

    What do you mean? The AC was talking about what's in the summary and article, and the article author's lack of reading comprehension. It's not like he was talking about toilets or systemd. It's just about as on-topic as it can get.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Tuesday September 17 2019, @08:27AM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday September 17 2019, @08:27AM (#895074) Journal
    We will have to agree to disagree.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by janrinok on Tuesday September 17 2019, @08:41AM (6 children)

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday September 17 2019, @08:41AM (#895076) Journal
    I misread, and I was wrong. I withdraw my comment.
    • (Score: 2) by chromas on Tuesday September 17 2019, @09:19AM (5 children)

      by chromas (34) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday September 17 2019, @09:19AM (#895081) Journal

      👍

      • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Wednesday September 18 2019, @12:01AM (4 children)

        by aristarchus (2645) on Wednesday September 18 2019, @12:01AM (#895420) Journal

        On the face of it, janrinok's comment has +2 karma, but if one peeks slightly behind the scenes, you can see he has garnered a extremely rare pure 4-disagree modding. Kudos, janrinok!

        • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Wednesday September 18 2019, @06:44AM (3 children)

          by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 18 2019, @06:44AM (#895521) Journal
          Look more closely - it's -5 Disagree thank you! :)
          • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Wednesday September 18 2019, @07:37AM (1 child)

            by aristarchus (2645) on Wednesday September 18 2019, @07:37AM (#895530) Journal

            Ah, but there is no "minus" to Disagree! Only a suggestion that a particular Editor might be slightly in error about the sense of the soylentils. There is no "plus" to Disagree, as well.

            • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Wednesday September 18 2019, @09:57AM

              by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 18 2019, @09:57AM (#895552) Journal

              You did see this [soylentnews.org] from yesterday, didn't you?

              After chromas pointed out he disagreed, I re-read the comment, corrected myself, and withdrew the comment. The other 'Disagrees', including yours, all appeared after that. I guess you/they hadn't read the thread in full before commenting.

          • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Wednesday September 18 2019, @11:24PM

            by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Wednesday September 18 2019, @11:24PM (#895890) Journal
            Awesome.. but it would be much more impress if you scored the elusive (mythical?) +5 troll.
            --
            SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.