Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday September 17 2019, @02:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the will-not-end-well dept.

Update: DannyB adds: United States Files Civil Lawsuit Against Edward Snowden

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/edward-snowden-nsa-cbs-this-morning-interview-today-2019-09-16/

When pressed on whether he considers what he did unlawful, Snowden refused to take a position but said "it's not hard to make the argument that I broke the law." He went on to say that the government continues to allege that his disclosures caused harm but, according to Snowden, has yet to show evidence of that harm.

"They never show evidence for it even though we're now more than 6 years on, it would be the easiest thing in the world to show. We've never heard that story," he said. "If they had some classified evidence that a hair on a single person's head was harmed, you know as well as I do, it would be on the front page of The New York Times by the end of the day."

Snowden also took issue with the common refrain that leaking classified documents violated the oath of secrecy he took upon entering the CIA. He said an oath of secrecy does not exist.

"One of the common misconceptions in one of the earlier attacks, that we heard in 2015, that we don't hear of so much anymore is that I violated this oath of secrecy. That does not exist. There is a secrecy agreement, but there is also an oath of service. An oath of service is to support and defend, not an agency, not even the president, it is to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies – direct quote – foreign and domestic. And this begs the question, what happens when our obligations come into conflict."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by DECbot on Tuesday September 17 2019, @11:27PM (1 child)

    by DECbot (832) on Tuesday September 17 2019, @11:27PM (#895408) Journal

    Maybe it was a feeling of gratitude toward the soldiers for winning the "big one".

    I wish it was like that. My thought, the Vets got home and observed how fucked up politics were and ran for a bunch of local offices. In the local elections, the soldiers often campaigned on anti-corruption platforms citing the fucked up things the sheriffs, judges, and county officials did during and right after the war. Things had to clean up or the Vets would win too many elections and later move into more powerful offices.

    --
    cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday September 17 2019, @11:44PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Tuesday September 17 2019, @11:44PM (#895417)

    Hmmm... that's a somewhat less cynical take, that "the people" actually grabbed ahold of democracy and put Vets in office who cared more about people than their own personal power. Not at all surprising that it was short lived, either way.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]