Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday September 18 2019, @10:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-could-go-wrong? dept.

Submitted via IRC for Fnord666

Billions of license plate scans are part of a private surveillance database

The US government might have reconsidered its plans for license plate recognition, but companies haven't -- and they've raised serious privacy concerns in the process. Motherboard has posted an exposé detailing the Digital Recognition Network, a privately run database that collects legions of plate recognition scans (roughly 9 billion to date) from repo drivers with camera-equipped cars. The system automatically captures both the plates and locations of every car they drive by, making it possible to track the movement of car owners across the US over months or even years. Anyone with access could find out where you live, work and socialize.

[...] As you might have already suspected, this automatic data gathering creates many issues. For one, most of the vehicles in the database are of completely innocent people who have no way of knowing if they're even included in the data set. And while a spokesperson for DRN said the company "takes data security seriously" and doesn't allow access without its approval, there have been instances where unauthorized people have obtained that access. It's feasible that users (approved and otherwise) could exploit this for stalking or gaining the upper hand in court without revealing sources.

Law enforcement can also use the system, and DRN's sibling brand Vigilant Solutions sells the tech to government agencies. That raises the potential of rogue officers using the plate tracking to intimidate protesters or witnesses of police abuses.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:08AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:08AM (#895935)

    s/to many/too many/

    keep it sexy

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:18AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:18AM (#895945)

    Both to and too are grammatically valid in that sentence.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:31AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:31AM (#895951)

      Actually, "too" is not grammatically correct in that sentence. "To" is.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:31AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:31AM (#895953)

        Ok, it is : )