Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the you-might-have-an-account! dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow6430

Lawsuit: AT&T signed customers up for DirecTV Now without their knowledge

AT&T supervisors encouraged sales reps to create fake DirecTV Now accounts to make the online video service seem more successful than it really was, a class-action complaint alleges.

AT&T "promot[ed] and reward[ed] account fraud" such as creating the fake accounts and signing AT&T customers up for DirecTV Now "without the customer knowing," the lawsuit claims.

The new allegations were made Friday in an amended complaint as part of a lawsuit filed against AT&T in April in US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit alleges that AT&T lied to investors in order to hide DirecTV Now's failure.

"AT&T misrepresented the true condition of DirecTV Now and hid the associated risks," the amended complaint says. DirecTV Now's inevitable failure was subsequently made clear when subscriber numbers began to drop, the amended complaint says:

The dramatic decline in DirecTV Now subscriber numbers was a materialization of the risks associated, including: improper sales practices, such as the creation of fake accounts, which predictably led subscribers to cancel these accounts, upon realizing they were being billed for a service they did not use; the aggressive use of promotional campaigns to artificially sustain subscriber levels; and selling the product at irrationally low prices that would ultimately need to increase.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @05:27PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @05:27PM (#896177)

    It's almost like mandatory sales quotas are bullshit rent extraction.

    What does this even mean? I don't see how sales quotas at all align with Economic Rent [wikipedia.org].

    It'd be just as meaningful to call mandatory sales quotas "communist," "piracy," or "terrorism." I would suggest that words have meanings, and people should use them appropriately.

  • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Thursday September 19 2019, @07:04PM

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 19 2019, @07:04PM (#896211) Journal

    No, they don't seem to at first glance.

    But they're very much about leveraging established power to increase income without any actual improvements in economic efficiency.