Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday September 19 2019, @09:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the expanding-like-a-waistline-on-Thanksgiving dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Reproduceability is key to science. A one-time “eureka!” could be the first step in a paradigm shift — or it could be a fluke. It’s the second, third, and hundredth measurements that put theories to the test.

That’s why recent measurements of the universe’s expansion have piqued interest. Even though astronomers have applied multiple methods relying on completely different physics, they’re still getting similar results: Today’s universe appears to be expanding faster than what’s expected based on measurements of the early universe. Can systematic errors explain this discrepancy? Or are new physics required?

Now Wendy Freedman (University of Chicago) and colleagues have posted a new, "middle-of-the-road" measurement on the astronomy preprint arXiv, adding a twist to the ongoing debate. The study will appear in the Astrophysical Journal.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by shrewdsheep on Thursday September 19 2019, @11:43AM (3 children)

    by shrewdsheep (5215) on Thursday September 19 2019, @11:43AM (#896053)

    otherwise the computer overheats

    Much to the contrary. Knowing one of the operators, I have indications that the computer is actually slowed down as the simulation becomes more complex It is actually a Turing Machine implemented physically and operated by turtles. Naturally, the longer they have to walk along the tape, the slower the simulation gets. Also they need more naps. Fortunately, this does not change coherency or clock time within the simulation in any way.

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by c0lo on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:17PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:17PM (#896074) Journal

    Knowing one of the operators,
    Knowing only one doesn't help too much to know the system, as none of them commute.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:50PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 19 2019, @01:50PM (#896079)

    I read somewhere that turtles was a mistranslation. It was actually tortoises.

    • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Thursday September 19 2019, @03:03PM

      by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 19 2019, @03:03PM (#896099) Homepage Journal

      Interesting. I first heard the myth as elephants standing on a turtle that is swimming in the cosmic sea. That would suggest that it *is* a turtle, and not a land-dwelling tortoise, and it's just one turtle, not turtles all the way down. Could the cosmic sea be a later, proof-texting emendation?