Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday September 19 2019, @07:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the landers-don't-bounce-well dept.

https://spacenews.com/lunar-lander-failures-offer-a-warning-to-commercial-missions/

The apparent failure of an Indian spacecraft to land on the moon this month is providing a reminder to NASA and its commercial partners of the challenges of not only the missions themselves but sharing data on problems they experience.

If Vikram crashed during landing, as many fear, it will be the second spacecraft this year to fail to land on the moon intact. Beresheet, a lander built by Israel Aerospace Industries for SpaceIL, suffered a malfunction during a landing attempt in April, causing the spacecraft to crash to the surface. Unlike Vikram, the mission team declared the landing unsuccessful shortly after losing contact.

Those failures are taking place as NASA is working with nine companies in the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program on robotic lunar landers that can carry NASA research payloads to the surface of the moon. Two of those companies, Astrobotic and Intuitive Machines, have awards from NASA to carry payloads on missions scheduled for launch in 2021.

None of the nine companies have yet to fly their landers, and the recent failures provide a reminder of how difficult it is to soft-land on the moon.

"From a management perspective, we just know this is hard and it's clear that our contractor pool has a steep challenge on their hands," said Camille Alleyne, deputy manager of the CLPS program at NASA's Johnson Space Center, during a Sept. 12 panel discussion at the American Astronautical Society's Wernher von Braun Memorial Symposium in Huntsville, Alabama.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Rupert Pupnick on Friday September 20 2019, @01:23PM

    by Rupert Pupnick (7277) on Friday September 20 2019, @01:23PM (#896479) Journal

    Well of course the technology isn't ready for commercial deployment because it's unreliable. If you're having malfunctions, you've got a reliability problem. If you are completely losing contact, you've got the worst reliability problem of all because you can't get any telemetry to give you a clue as to what went wrong so you can fix the design. I guess the operating budget for these probes is much smaller than that of Apollo.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2