Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday September 21 2019, @10:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the they-must-be-on-drugs dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Sacklers threaten to scrap opioid deal if they aren't shielded from lawsuits

Lawyers for OxyContin-maker Purdue Pharma filed a new complaint late Wednesday threatening that the company's mega-rich owners, the Sackler family, could pull out of a proposed multi-billion-dollar opioid settlement deal if a bankruptcy judge doesn't shield the family from outstanding state lawsuits.

Purdue's lawyers argue that if the lawsuits continue, the Sacklers will have to waste "hundreds of millions of dollars" on legal costs that could otherwise go to claimants in the settlement. The family's lawyers added that in that event, the family "may be unwilling—or unable—to make the billions of dollars of contributions" to the proposed settlement.

State attorneys general, however, argue that the tactic is yet another move designed to shield the Sacklers and their ill-gotten wealth.

"This filing isn't a surprise. It's yet another effort by Purdue to avoid accountability and shield the Sackler family fortune, and we will be opposing it," Maura Healey, the attorney general of Massachusetts, told the New York Times.

Related:


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 22 2019, @02:40AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 22 2019, @02:40AM (#896989)

    So you're saying ...

    ... the FDA were asleep at the switch, but because they're "public servants" (whatever the hell that means) they're off the hook?

    Great. First place to cut the federal budget starts with those wastes of space.

    Oh, wait, it's only private individuals that get fucked by piercing the corporate veil when governments get grabby with cash. Because lord knows they're not actually willing to consider a harm reduction approach. That would give way too many rights back to the muddy little peons who need to step back in line.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 22 2019, @02:53AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 22 2019, @02:53AM (#896993)

    Yes, let's throw the baby out with the bath water.

  • (Score: 2) by stretch611 on Sunday September 22 2019, @04:29AM (1 child)

    by stretch611 (6199) on Sunday September 22 2019, @04:29AM (#897006)

    the FDA were asleep at the switch, but because they're "public servants" (whatever the hell that means) they're off the hook?

    What fault of it is the FDA, if all the mandatory studies handed to them contained flawed or incomplete data?

    Or do you somehow think that they told the FDA the truth while lying to all the Doctors?

    --
    Now with 5 covid vaccine shots/boosters altering my DNA :P
    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Sunday September 22 2019, @12:14PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday September 22 2019, @12:14PM (#897079) Journal

      What fault of it is the FDA, if all the mandatory studies handed to them contained flawed or incomplete data?

      It's their job to make sure those mandatory studies didn't contain flawed or incomplete data. After all, who is mandating those studies in the first place?