Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday September 21 2019, @10:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the they-must-be-on-drugs dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Sacklers threaten to scrap opioid deal if they aren't shielded from lawsuits

Lawyers for OxyContin-maker Purdue Pharma filed a new complaint late Wednesday threatening that the company's mega-rich owners, the Sackler family, could pull out of a proposed multi-billion-dollar opioid settlement deal if a bankruptcy judge doesn't shield the family from outstanding state lawsuits.

Purdue's lawyers argue that if the lawsuits continue, the Sacklers will have to waste "hundreds of millions of dollars" on legal costs that could otherwise go to claimants in the settlement. The family's lawyers added that in that event, the family "may be unwilling—or unable—to make the billions of dollars of contributions" to the proposed settlement.

State attorneys general, however, argue that the tactic is yet another move designed to shield the Sacklers and their ill-gotten wealth.

"This filing isn't a surprise. It's yet another effort by Purdue to avoid accountability and shield the Sackler family fortune, and we will be opposing it," Maura Healey, the attorney general of Massachusetts, told the New York Times.

Related:


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by RamiK on Sunday September 22 2019, @11:52AM

    by RamiK (1813) on Sunday September 22 2019, @11:52AM (#897071)

    Given the direct involvement of the Sacklers in marketing oxycontin over multiple decades and in spite of evidence of its detrimental effects, I believe criminal liability ought to be on the table, especially pour encourager les autres.

    Maybe but unlikely. The fact the evidences were presented in medical publications for decades and other countries followed through and limited the use of those drugs to in-hospital care also implicates the doctors prescribing the drugs and the regulators who didn't see fit to act based on the evidence. So, with so many power dynamics and individuals on the line, someone is going to let them get away with it to prevent the spread of liability from reaching their doorstep.

    The truth is that the only reason oxy is taken off the shelves (and marijuana is being legalized) is because the relevant patents expired. These trials are there to smooth corporate operations. Not to seek justice. Not to compensate victims. The judges will likely play along unless approached by someone in power who is in conflict with the family or a politician seeking to make a name for themselves.

    --
    compiling...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2