Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday September 21 2019, @10:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the they-must-be-on-drugs dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Sacklers threaten to scrap opioid deal if they aren't shielded from lawsuits

Lawyers for OxyContin-maker Purdue Pharma filed a new complaint late Wednesday threatening that the company's mega-rich owners, the Sackler family, could pull out of a proposed multi-billion-dollar opioid settlement deal if a bankruptcy judge doesn't shield the family from outstanding state lawsuits.

Purdue's lawyers argue that if the lawsuits continue, the Sacklers will have to waste "hundreds of millions of dollars" on legal costs that could otherwise go to claimants in the settlement. The family's lawyers added that in that event, the family "may be unwilling—or unable—to make the billions of dollars of contributions" to the proposed settlement.

State attorneys general, however, argue that the tactic is yet another move designed to shield the Sacklers and their ill-gotten wealth.

"This filing isn't a surprise. It's yet another effort by Purdue to avoid accountability and shield the Sackler family fortune, and we will be opposing it," Maura Healey, the attorney general of Massachusetts, told the New York Times.

Related:


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday September 22 2019, @06:54PM (4 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday September 22 2019, @06:54PM (#897215) Journal

    That seems an indication that you didn't understand either Fitzgerald, or Orwell as well as you might have.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Sunday September 22 2019, @10:22PM (3 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Sunday September 22 2019, @10:22PM (#897270) Journal

    The essence of Doublethink is holding two contradictory ideas and believing them both at the same time. That's directly from 1984. I'd say you're the one who doesn't know the source material. Come on, you were doing so well before and now you're back to this...

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday September 23 2019, @04:53AM (2 children)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 23 2019, @04:53AM (#897418) Journal

      In 1984 Tth problem was, and the plot for the story was, the narrator DID NOT believe. He lost his faith, lost his way, and thus rebelled against the system. Aminotrite?

      • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Tuesday September 24 2019, @02:08AM (1 child)

        by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Tuesday September 24 2019, @02:08AM (#897906) Journal

        If that's what you took from the story, and if you even dare to set yourself up as some sort of modern-day parallel to Winston..."reading comprehension issues" doesn't even *begin* to delve into what's wrong with that. Holy Boston barbecued baked beans on black bread.

        --
        I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday September 24 2019, @02:17PM

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday September 24 2019, @02:17PM (#898132) Journal

          WTF? Compare myself to Winston? FFS, no. Thanks for reminding me of his name. Winston is the office puke type. I've had to hold a desk down a couple times in my life, but I'm most definitely NOT an office puke. Put into Winston's place, I'd be busy assembling a nice firebomb.