Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday September 22 2019, @03:38AM   Printer-friendly
from the fly-in-the-ointment dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

'Worse Than Anyone Expected': Air Travel Emissions Vastly Outpace Predictions

Greenhouse gas emissions from commercial air travel are growing at a faster clip than predicted in previous, already dire, projections, according to new research — putting pressure on airline regulators to take stronger action as they prepare for a summit next week.

The United Nations aviation body forecasts that airplane emissions of carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas, will reach just over 900 million metric tons in 2018, and then triple by 2050.

But the new research, from the International Council on Clean Transportation, found that emissions from global air travel may be increasing more than 1.5 times as fast as the U.N. estimate. The researchers analyzed nearly 40 million flights around the world last year.

"Airlines, for all intents and purposes, are becoming more fuel efficient. But we're seeing demand outstrip any of that," said Brandon Graver, who led the new study. "The climate challenge for aviation is worse than anyone expected."

Airlines in recent years have invested in lighter, more fuel-efficient aircraft, and have explored powering their planes with biofuel.

Over all, air travel accounts for about 2.5 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions — a far smaller share than emissions from passenger cars or power plants. Still, one study found that the rapid growth in plane emissions could mean that by 2050, aviation could take up a quarter of the world's "carbon budget," or the amount of carbon dioxide emissions permitted to keep global temperature rise to within 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.

[...] The decision by Greta Thunberg, a young climate activist, to sail across the Atlantic rather than travel by air ahead of her speech at the United Nations next week, has refocused attention on aviation's role in causing climate change and its consequences, including sea-level rise and more intense heat waves, hurricanes, flooding and drought.

Climate protesters have said they plan to gather in Montreal next week, where airline regulators are set to hold their own summit.

William Raillant-Clark, a spokesman for the U.N. aviation body, stood by its emissions projection, which he said was "the most up-to-date" and provided "a clear picture on the future environmental trends." He added that the group "endorses and welcomes wholeheartedly" calls for the aviation industry to address climate change with greater urgency.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by sfm on Sunday September 22 2019, @05:04AM (3 children)

    by sfm (675) on Sunday September 22 2019, @05:04AM (#897012)

    Assuming real life follows the predictions for future air travel, where does that leave us for
    options? It is a given that airlines will continue to push for better fuel economy in planes.
    The only other "knob" we can turn is to reduce the demand for air travel.
    Not an easy pill to swallow.

  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 22 2019, @05:18AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 22 2019, @05:18AM (#897020)

    Simple. The poor and middle class should notbe able to fly but the rich and politicians (but i repeat myself) MUST fly to show how bad it really is and promise they are biting the bullet because its uncomftorable.

    #greennewdeal

  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Sunday September 22 2019, @12:08PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Sunday September 22 2019, @12:08PM (#897075)

    The only other "knob" we can turn is to reduce the demand for air travel.

    You could kill the global economy - a reduction in international travel naturally follows.

    You could tax the bejesus out of meatspace air travel, use the funds to provide ubiquitous free or very low cost ultra-high definition teleconferencing facilities.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 2) by Nuke on Sunday September 22 2019, @12:17PM

    by Nuke (3162) on Sunday September 22 2019, @12:17PM (#897080)

    The only other "knob" we can turn is to reduce the demand for air travel. Not an easy pill to swallow.

    I have not been in an aircraft since I was with the military. The guys I work with are always hopping on and off planes, mostly for weekend trips to foreign capitals (but they all look the same to me) and for shopping. (they tell me Dubai is wonderful place to buy jewellery). Yeah, sad loss for the middle classes, they will be stuck with too much money. Cue sobbing violins.