Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday September 28 2019, @06:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the Politics dept.

More (and ongoing) developments on the Whistleblower/Ukraine thing:

House Speaker Pelosi has begun an inquiry into impeachment of the president:
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/24/763700264/trumps-ukraine-call-may-be-game-changer-on-impeachment

The (live at the time of this submission: 2019-09-26 14:30 UTC) House Intelligence interview of the Acting Director of National Security:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-49841920

The unclassified-version of the whistleblower complaint was released:
https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf

As was the memo/pseudo-transcript (not 100% guaranteed as they are hand-typed, no recordings of calls are made any more in the US in the aftermath of Watergate) on the call between Presidents Trump and Zelenskyy[*]:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

[*] Yes, Zelenskyy, see: Zelensky, Zelenskiy, Zelenskyy: spelling confusion doesn't help Ukraine.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by hemocyanin on Saturday September 28 2019, @02:59PM (1 child)

    by hemocyanin (186) on Saturday September 28 2019, @02:59PM (#899931) Journal

    The impeachment was pretty much a given. There's been a strong push for it dating back even before the inauguration. It was going to happen.

    Aside from Hillary loyalists, I think most people see the fact that they've been trying to impeach before he even took office, as evidence that their claims are hot air or sour grapes, and among those who do see it as a political hit job, are many who don't actually like Trump. I am in this group but I view the Democrats' action as a petty desperate scramble and an attempt to win by cheating (which doesn't surprise considering the deeply offensive primary process for 2016).

    I also think there are plenty of voters who don't like Trump personally, but don't hate his presidency either. I'm in this camp mostly because he hasn't started any new wars (at least not yet) and stopped (or at least postponed) the TPP. You can't give Obama that sort of praise. I guess where I'm at is that between Trump and the DNC, they both look awful but at least Trump hasn't been out there starting wars, killing people, and laughing about it. The other part of this equation is that Obama eviscerated many voters' trust when Hope and Change turned into GWB 2.0. It makes it difficult to believe that the next hope/change-Democrat is going to act anything like the campaign propaganda.

    Democrats need to learn that nostalgia for who they were in the 70s and pretty rhetoric will only go so far. People want to see Democrats do something that helps improve their lives, rather than trade sweetheart deals between themselves, run impeachment show-trials, and start or extend expensive deadly imperialist wars.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 28 2019, @06:32PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 28 2019, @06:32PM (#899997)

    It makes it difficult to believe that the next hope/change-Democrat is going to act anything like the campaign propaganda.

    This is why Biden promises "no change": https://www.salon.com/2019/06/19/joe-biden-to-rich-donors-nothing-would-fundamentally-change-if-hes-elected/ [salon.com]