More (and ongoing) developments on the Whistleblower/Ukraine thing:
House Speaker Pelosi has begun an inquiry into impeachment of the president:
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/24/763700264/trumps-ukraine-call-may-be-game-changer-on-impeachment
The (live at the time of this submission: 2019-09-26 14:30 UTC) House Intelligence interview of the Acting Director of National Security:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-49841920
The unclassified-version of the whistleblower complaint was released:
https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf
As was the memo/pseudo-transcript (not 100% guaranteed as they are hand-typed, no recordings of calls are made any more in the US in the aftermath of Watergate) on the call between Presidents Trump and Zelenskyy[*]:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf
[*] Yes, Zelenskyy, see: Zelensky, Zelenskiy, Zelenskyy: spelling confusion doesn't help Ukraine.
(Score: 3, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 28 2019, @06:12PM (1 child)
Yes, we can all tell what "news" you have been watching from your post:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfu_RIdGT2A [youtube.com]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZVv2AOCnaA [youtube.com]
It is pointless to discuss with you when all your important thoughts and decisions are already being controlled by someone else. You still get to choose which sportsball team is your favorite though.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 28 2019, @11:39PM
Um. By scare-quoting "news" you make a pretty strong claim, and then based on
you conclude the GP had to have been watching one specific stream.
But GP clearly watches through multiple media sources, or wouldn't know that "totally exonerated" is being claimed by some.
Then you make a sportsball reference to try to win nerd points.
Sorry though, anyone bothering to actually read what you wrote ought to realize you're trolling (or shilling, who cares). Try being more subtle next time.