Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday September 29 2019, @08:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the do-the-bits-protest-their-crowded-conditions? dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Wednesday, Intel announced it's joining Toshiba in the PLC (Penta-Level Cell, meaning 5 bits stored per individual NAND cell) club. Intel has not yet commercialized the technology, so you can't go and buy a PLC SSD yet—but we can expect the technology will lead eventually to higher-capacity and cheaper solid state drives.

Intel also differentiates itself from competitors by sticking with the floating-gate cell design used in early SLC devices, instead of the less expensive charge-trap design the rest of the industry has shifted to. It's unclear to casual researchers which technology is actually better from a technical perspective, but Intel argues that the floating gates can be manufactured at a higher density, meaning it can pack more cells into the same physical area.

Unfortunately, while PLC SSDs will likely be bigger and cheaper, they'll probably also be slower. Modern SSDs mostly use TLC storage with a small layer of SLC write cache. As long as you don't write too much data too fast, your SSD writes will seem as blazingly fast as your reads—for example, Samsung's consumer drives are rated for up to 520MB/sec. But that's only as long as you keep inside the relatively small SLC cache layer; once you've filled that and must write directly to the main media in real time, things slow down enormously.

[...] With sequential write speeds to QLC media already decreasing to or below that of conventional hard drives, PLC seems likely to be a niche player that will compete far more with NAS and datacenter drives than it does with laptop and desktop SSDs aimed at high performance. Sequential throughput isn't everything, of course—and PLC media should still offer much higher IOPS in challenging random-access workloads than conventional disks can. But it's probably not going to be a good solution in anything but truly massive-capacity drives, which can use higher parallelism (think "invisible RAID0") to offset the invididually-slow characteristics of PLC cells.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by pTamok on Sunday September 29 2019, @09:07PM

    by pTamok (3042) on Sunday September 29 2019, @09:07PM (#900521)

    Found via The Register

    Blocks and Files:Using QLC for cold storage is a fool’s errand [blocksandfiles.com]

    Humble advice

            Stick to proven TLC. Let someone else save a nickel and learn hard lessons.
            Consider SLC for systems where the data sets are small but the over-writes are high. (Its endurance is far higher than that of MLC, TLC and QLC.)

    Note: Consultant and patent holder Hubbert Smith has held senior product and marketing roles Toshiba Memory America, Samsung Semiconductor, NetApp, Western Digital and Intel.