Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday October 01 2019, @11:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the the-telephone-game dept.

Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956

In January, WhatsApp reduced the limit for forwarding content to five users or groups at a time. The feature had been trialled in India last year, in the wake of violence fuelled by rumours spread via the messaging service.

While the researchers didn't have access to private communications, they ran simulations based on the data they gathered from public groups to test the effect of forwarding limits on the spread of content.

They found that the five-forward limit slowed the spread of content by one order of magnitude. For example, if a piece of content would ordinarily take five days to reach an entire network, the limit would slow the spread to 50 days.

This would give fact checkers far more time to verify the truth of a piece of content, says Benevenuto.

But this delay depended on the virality of the content – how likely users are to share an image after seeing it. For highly viral content, the limits weren't effective in preventing it from quickly reaching a large portion of the network.

Source: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2217937-whatsapp-restrictions-slow-the-spread-of-fake-news-but-dont-stop-it/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by VLM on Tuesday October 01 2019, @11:01PM

    by VLM (445) on Tuesday October 01 2019, @11:01PM (#901541)

    Well, OK. But that's kinda like I'd join a religion if I could find one that's scientifically verified to be true... Sounds nice, but sounds somewhat impractical.

    Interesting thought experiment, you'll never get what you're looking for from legacy entertainment sources like CNN or NYT, or for that matter from far left centrally censored social media. But... you can get scientific journals that aren't too ridiculous, at least in the hard sciences. I don't think there's anyone covering pop culture to the level of academic rigor of Nature or similar, but in theory its interesting.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3