Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday October 02 2019, @01:49AM   Printer-friendly
from the Who-does? dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Teenagers are less likely to cooperate and put effort into their mother's requests when they are said in a controlling tone of voice, researchers have found.

Speaking to a son or daughter in a pressurising tone is also accompanied by a range of negative emotions and less feelings of closeness, a new study has discovered.

The experimental study involving over 1000 adolescents aged 14-15 is the first to examine how subjects respond to the tone of voice when receiving instructions from their mothers, even when the specific words that are used are exactly the same.

Lead author of the study Dr Netta Weinstein, from Cardiff University, said: "If parents want conversations with their teens to have the most benefit, it's important to remember to use supportive tones of voice. It's easy for parents to forget, especially if they are feeling stressed, tired, or pressured themselves."

The study showed that subjects were much more likely to engage with instructions that conveyed a sense of encouragement and support for self-expression and choice.

The results, whilst of obvious interest to parents, could also be of relevance to schoolteachers whose use of more motivational language could impact the learning and well-being of students in their classrooms.

"Adolescents likely feel more cared about and happier, and as a result they try harder at school, when parents and teachers speak in supportive rather than pressuring tones of voice," Dr Weinstein continued.

The new study, published today in the journal Developmental Psychology[*], involved 486 males and 514 females, aged 14-15.

[*] Paywalled


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by i286NiNJA on Wednesday October 02 2019, @04:05PM

    by i286NiNJA (2768) on Wednesday October 02 2019, @04:05PM (#901905)

    If the consequences are there and immediate I've noticed you can say it however you want. No video games for a day has been threatened and will become a fact as unavoidable as any force of nature. It will not be walked back and continuing will mean it goes to a month pretty damn fast.
    If this is all over some shit yesterday you'll have mixed results and might want to let some things slide.