Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday October 02 2019, @02:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the believe-it-or-not dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1337

More and more countries are mounting disinformation campaigns online

[...] That's a long way of saying that I forgive you if you'd like to skip today's news and instead just read nothing but explainers and Twitter threads about impeachment. It's kind of the biggest story in the world right now, and it will all play out in new and exciting and probably terrifying ways across all our big social platforms, and if you want to read some speculation on how I'd point you to this savvy Kevin Roose piece on the subject (further excerpted below).

But say you've finished your impeachment reading for the day and are eager to luxuriate in a good old-fashioned tale of platform-based information warfare. In that case may I please recommend a new report from researchers at Oxford University on the usage of disinformation campaigns by governments around the world. And usage is ... well, I bet you can guess!

Here's Davey Alba and Adam Satariano in the New York Times:

The researchers compiled information from news organizations, civil society groups and governments to create one of the most comprehensive inventories of disinformation practices by governments around the world. They found that the number of countries with political disinformation campaigns more than doubled to 70 in the last two years, with evidence of at least one political party or government entity in each of those countries engaging in social media manipulation.

In addition, Facebook remains the No. 1 social network for disinformation, the report said. Organized propaganda campaigns were found on the platform in 56 countries.

You can read the report yourself here. Personally I found it useful to just read a straightforward guide to the varieties of state-sponsored information attacks — most of which have long been in use, of course, by more garden-variety trolls.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Wednesday October 02 2019, @07:56PM (2 children)

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday October 02 2019, @07:56PM (#902001) Homepage Journal

    Pence might have had conversations of a very different nature with the Ukraine.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 03 2019, @01:34PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 03 2019, @01:34PM (#902259)

    Ones where he doesn't release transcripts that show... pretty much exactly what the whistle-blower report states.

    I've read it, and while it isn't a blatant, "investigate Biden or we will with-hold aid," it does come off as being similar to, "that is some nice foreign aid we are giving you, be a shame if something were to happen to it."

    Basically, the president of Ukraine (I'll call him Pres Z), said that he really appreciates the aid the US is giving, and he's looking forward to the next installment so he can buy some missiles from us (Javelins in the transcript). Trump then IMMEADIATELY pivots to "I would like you to do a favor for us though..." and asks him to investigate Crowdstrike, Pres Z says, "I guarantee... that all investigations will be done openly and candidly." Then Trump asks him to look into the removal of the prosecutor at Biden's request. Biden's name is in the transcript at this point.

    I should point out that at this time, US aid to Ukraine had been delayed. So things aren't explicitly laid out, but they are still pretty clearly hinted at.