Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday October 03 2019, @04:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the security-is-a-process dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1337

Urgent/11 Flaws Impact More RTOS Used by Medical, Industrial Devices

IoT security firm Armis has confirmed that the recently disclosed vulnerabilities tracked as Urgent/11 affect several real time operating systems (RTOS) other than VxWorks.

Armis revealed in late July that Wind River's VxWorks operating system, which is used by millions of devices, is affected by 11 vulnerabilities, including critical flaws that can be exploited to take control of devices.

Several major industrial and automation solutions providers whose products use VxWorks have issued advisories to inform users on the impact of the Urgent/11 vulnerabilities.

When it first disclosed its findings, Armis noted that the flaws exist in the VxWorks IPnet TCP/IP stack and warned that other RTOS may be affected as well considering that Interpeak licensed this IPnet stack to other vendors before it was acquired by Wind River in 2006.

Armis now says it has identified six other RTOS that use the problematic IPnet stack, including ZebOS by IP Infusion, ITRON by TRON Forum, OSE by ENEA, Nucleus RTOS by Mentor, Integrity by Green Hills, and ThreadX by Microsoft.

Many embedded systems rely on these RTOS, including many medical and industrial devices. Armis has been able to validate the impact of the flaws on BD Alaris infusion pumps running OSE, the HP Proliant management engine based on Nucleus, Canon printers that use ThreadX, Planex routers based on ZebOS, and ArrowSpan access points that run Integrity.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by KilroySmith on Thursday October 03 2019, @07:59PM

    by KilroySmith (2113) on Thursday October 03 2019, @07:59PM (#902414)

    >>> I'm surprised that implementing an IP stack for an RTOS is possible
    Well, if you had any experience in the realm you wouldn't be surprised. Can I ask a question? If the IP stack isn't running under the RTOS, then where is the alternative "rather standard IP stack" running?

    Kids these days. Sheesh.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2