Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday October 05 2019, @04:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the fake-news dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Rights groups, tech companies, academics and journalists opposed the law, which they say threatens free speech.

A "fake news" law, decried by academics, activists and tech giants, has gone into effect in Singapore, despite warnings that the measures could be used to stifle dissent and free speech in the South East Asian island country.

The law, which was passed by Singapore's parliament in May but took effect on Wednesday, gives government ministers powers to order social media companies to put warnings next to posts authorities deem to be false, order some content to be removed and in some cases block websites deemed to be propagating false information contrary to "public interest".

In April, shortly before the bill passed, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, said the legislation was an "essential part" of fighting fake news and hate speech. 

[...] Over 170 academics signed a letter saying the legislation had been fast-tracked without proper input from "key civil society actors."

The law is "likely to have a chilling effect on freedom of expression and academic freedom in Singapore", they said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Arik on Saturday October 05 2019, @06:54PM (2 children)

    by Arik (4543) on Saturday October 05 2019, @06:54PM (#903169) Journal
    They're very keen to censor. They control Singapore now so this is no surprise. They even censor far outside their borders via TOS, it should surprise no one to see them doing it inside the area they control.
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 06 2019, @02:03AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 06 2019, @02:03AM (#903263)

    This is the PRC

    Citation needed.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Arik on Sunday October 06 2019, @02:44AM

      by Arik (4543) on Sunday October 06 2019, @02:44AM (#903268) Journal
      Sure, it's not technically part of China yet.

      But it's closer than Hong Kong, politically.

      https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-and-china-s-common-interest-greater-than-any-8878812

      They've been getting progressively cozier for decades, and the folks that were strongly against the PRC have mostly picked up and left. Leaving it even more strongly pro-PRC.

      It's a very convenient asset for China, a money-laundering capital just next door with a compliant government that's happy to deal with them.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rIdpYw2ke4

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV0AgsokLNw

      Singapore is a tiny and extremely wealthy city state which lies only something like 300 miles south of the closest Chinese claim. It gives them a solid base to the south of Vietnam, which would allow them to invade from both North AND South simultaneously in their next war. It's some extremely important strategic real estate for them and they are quite deeply invested.

      https://www.straitstimes.com/business/economy/spore-top-destination-for-china-investments
      --
      If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?