Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday October 07 2019, @08:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the rfid-tagged-cards dept.

Submitted via IRC for pinchy

Stones Gambling Hall pulls plug on livestreamed poker games after cheating allegations against regular player

Stones Gambling Hall in Sacramento, California says it will not livestream poker games pending an investigation into cheating allegations made against one of the game's players, Mike Postle.

Postle has been a regular on "Stones Live," a live poker game streamed on Twitch. His success in the game has raised eyebrows.

The original accusations were made by Veronica Brill, another poker player who has played with Postle on "Stones Live." Since then, others have come forward with similar complaints.

Brill has no specific accusation of what Postle is doing and even admits that she can't be sure he is cheating. So why does she think he is cheating? His results are too good, according to Brill.

She said (and several professional pokers players who talked to CNBC, agreed) no one could do as well as he has, for as long as he has, on these livestreamed games.

Postle has not yet responded to CNBC's request for comment. He has defended himself on Twitter as well as on a poker podcast, "The Mouthpiece with Mike Matusow," saying "it is absolutely impossible for me to be doing what they're claiming. It is 1000% impossible."

[...] In a statement Stones Gambling Hall said: "We temporarily halted all broadcasts from Stones. We have also, as a result, halted the use of RFID playing cards."

The RFID cards contain chips, that combined with readers in the poker table, transmit information about each player's hole cards, so that viewers can see the cards on the broadcast (which is on a 30-minute delay to protect game integrity).

At this point, there is no specific allegation, no "smoking gun" as Berkey said. But many pros are pointing to those RFID cards and the hole card information, saying it's just not possible for Postle to play the way he does and win the way he does.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by hemocyanin on Monday October 07 2019, @04:57PM (2 children)

    by hemocyanin (186) on Monday October 07 2019, @04:57PM (#903758) Journal

    The older method was to use a camera. In some games you'll see a glass pane on the table and players are expected to expose their cards to the camera underneath. Alternatively, some tables have cameras in the rail point horizontally across the table, and a player would peak at the cards in the normal fashion and expose the hole cards to the camera.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 07 2019, @09:36PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 07 2019, @09:36PM (#903848)

    Occasionally it would go wrong and the camera wouldn't see the cards, but the rail cam worked 99% of the time. But it's probably cheaper this way as you don't need special tables, and you needed a human operator to read and input the cards.

    I expect the players didn't like the glass pane setup as it interrupts their normal routine.

  • (Score: 2) by Fnord666 on Wednesday October 09 2019, @12:22PM

    by Fnord666 (652) on Wednesday October 09 2019, @12:22PM (#904670) Homepage

    The older method was to use a camera. In some games you'll see a glass pane on the table and players are expected to expose their cards to the camera underneath. Alternatively, some tables have cameras in the rail point horizontally across the table, and a player would peak at the cards in the normal fashion and expose the hole cards to the camera.

    Thanks. This is what I've seen in the past on the rare occasion when I've watched poker.