Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 11 2019, @12:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the its-quiet-awl-write-two-laugh-hat-you're-miss-steaks dept.

I was recently introduced to Professor Paul Brians' web site at Washington State University (WSU). I know I've made many mistakes like these over the years, and would like to think that I have learned from those mistakes. Would that I could have learned them, then, without having to go through those experiences.

So, with a sense of gratitude for what I've been taught and learned so far, and in hopes that it might afford a Soylentil a chance to avoid a red-face-inducing faux pas, I offer you examples of some Common Errors in English Usage:

People send me quite a few word confusions which don't seem worth writing up but which are nevertheless entertaining or interesting. I simply list a number of these below for your amusement. Many of them are discussed on the Eggcorn Database site.

Note: if you don't find what you're looking for below, please be aware that this is only a supplementary page to a much more extensive site that begins here.

NOTE: This is a greatly thinned list of examples from the linked page and has been reformatted for use here. Ellipses ([...]) between entries are implied.

What was saidWhat was meant
ad homonymad hominem
aerobic numbersArabic numbers
ashfaultasphalt
Cadillac convertercatalytic converter
circus sizedcircumcised
deformation of characterdefamation of character
flamingo dancerflamenco dancer
four-stair heatingforced-air heating
gentile mannersgenteel manners
glaucomoleglaucoma
gorilla warfareguerilla warfare
Heineken removerHeimlich maneuver
immaculate degenerationmacular degeneration
in sinkin synch
ivy towerivory tower
misconscrewmisconstrue
muncho manmacho man
parody of virtueparagon of virtue
piece of mindpeace of mind
pot-bellied politicspork-barrel politics
shock waysshockwaves
techknowledgytechnology
two sense worthtwo cents' worth
tyrannical yolktyrannical yoke
very close veinsvaricose veins
windshield factorwind chill factor

What are your favorites — either from this list — or from elsewhere?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by gtomorrow on Friday October 11 2019, @01:02PM (13 children)

    by gtomorrow (2230) on Friday October 11 2019, @01:02PM (#905702)

    Sorry...forgot to add one of my favorites...

    "...for all intensive purposes." That one, for me, immediately knocks the person down two rungs on the intelligence ladder.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by DannyB on Friday October 11 2019, @02:03PM (7 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 11 2019, @02:03PM (#905738) Journal

    Intensive Porpoises.

    If your porpoise is to communicate effectively, you need to listen to it more carefully.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    • (Score: 2) by gtomorrow on Friday October 11 2019, @02:15PM (5 children)

      by gtomorrow (2230) on Friday October 11 2019, @02:15PM (#905753)

      Four rungs down for you! :D :D :D

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 11 2019, @02:41PM (3 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 11 2019, @02:41PM (#905774)

        Use of emojiis, BOTTOM OF THE PILE! :P

        • (Score: 3, Informative) by Osamabobama on Friday October 11 2019, @04:29PM (1 child)

          by Osamabobama (5842) on Friday October 11 2019, @04:29PM (#905873)

          Emojis are graphical; these are emoticons.

          --
          Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 12 2019, @07:14PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 12 2019, @07:14PM (#906409)

            Ah the irony of you being a grammar nazi >:)

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 11 2019, @04:41PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 11 2019, @04:41PM (#905880)

          Use of emojiis, BOTTOM OF THE PILE! :P

          LOL.

          Alright, then. I'll just get me coat.

      • (Score: 2) by VanessaE on Saturday October 12 2019, @07:34AM

        by VanessaE (3396) <vanessa.e.dannenberg@gmail.com> on Saturday October 12 2019, @07:34AM (#906257) Journal

        THERE! ARE! FOUR! RUNGS!

        Wait, what?

    • (Score: 5, Funny) by archfeld on Friday October 11 2019, @07:17PM

      by archfeld (4650) <treboreel@live.com> on Friday October 11 2019, @07:17PM (#905996) Journal

      People use that one to increase the endolphin rush :)

      --
      For the NSA : Explosives, guns, assassination, conspiracy, primers, detonators, initiators, main charge, nuclear charge
  • (Score: 2) by acid andy on Friday October 11 2019, @08:36PM

    by acid andy (1683) on Friday October 11 2019, @08:36PM (#906033) Homepage Journal

    Its rediculous you wood pickup that pacific fing. Did you loose your come on sence? Ofcourse we can chock it up to your in experience.

    --
    If a cat has kittens, does a rat have rittens, a bat bittens and a mat mittens?
  • (Score: 2) by SpockLogic on Saturday October 12 2019, @01:56AM (3 children)

    by SpockLogic (2762) on Saturday October 12 2019, @01:56AM (#906156)

    "...for all intensive purposes."

    I had a young typist return a report with "... to all in tents and porpoises ...". It took me five minutes to stop laughing.

    --
    Overreacting is one thing, sticking your head up your ass hoping the problem goes away is another - edIII
    • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Saturday October 12 2019, @09:25AM

      by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Saturday October 12 2019, @09:25AM (#906275) Journal

      While it really should have been "to all intents and purposes"! That's possibly why she got it wrong.

      Did you both have a good laugh at each other?

    • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Saturday October 12 2019, @09:32AM (1 child)

      by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Saturday October 12 2019, @09:32AM (#906276) Journal

      I may have misunderstood your comment - if so please excuse my correction. I read it as you saying 'intensive purposes' and the secretary recording it as you described.

      • (Score: 2) by SpockLogic on Saturday October 12 2019, @01:01PM

        by SpockLogic (2762) on Saturday October 12 2019, @01:01PM (#906311)

        I had dictated "to all intents and purposes" and got back her gut busting version. Even though it was nearly 40 years ago it still makes me smile when I think about it.

        --
        Overreacting is one thing, sticking your head up your ass hoping the problem goes away is another - edIII