Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday October 12 2019, @10:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-all-you-have-is-a-big-cloud-all-your-games-will-be-movies dept.

Stadia (Google's next gen gaming console) will use AI to achieve negative latency in games

Speaking with Alex Wiltshire in Edge magazine #338, Google's top streaming engineer claims the company is verging on gaming superiority with its cloud streaming service, Stadia, thanks to the advancements it's making in modelling and machine learning. It's even eyeing up the gaming performance crown in just a couple of years.

"Ultimately, we think in a year or two we'll have games that are running faster and feel more responsive in the cloud than they do locally," Bakar says to Edge, "regardless of how powerful the local machine is."

This would be achieved using Google's homegrown streaming tech, which it's been teasing ever since Stadia was first announced late last year with Project Stream. The company believes its tech is capable of overcoming the hurdles presented by over-the-web gaming, despite its extensive web of datacentres sitting potentially hundreds of miles away from a user.

Specifically Bakar notes Google's "negative latency" will act as a workaround for any potential lag between player and server. This term describes a buffer of predicted latency, inherent to a Stadia players setup or connection, in which the Stadia system will run lag mitigation. This can include increasing fps rapidly to reduce latency between player input and display, or even predicting user inputs.

Yes, you heard that correctly. Stadia might start predicting what action, button, or movement you're likely to do next and render it ready for you – which sounds rather frightening.

With enough latency, the game will play itself and the console will just stream the game-play movie. I have the feeling a Netflix subscription will be cheaper.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday October 13 2019, @12:02AM (1 child)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Sunday October 13 2019, @12:02AM (#906464) Homepage
    If the player looks disadvantaged, give them an artificial advantage by giving them the benefit of the doubt.

    Who could ever have predicted that that would go wrong...

    (Nope, I have decided to not draw comparisons with "Ms. Monopoly" in this post.)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 13 2019, @07:26AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 13 2019, @07:26AM (#906566)

    If the player looks disadvantaged, give them an artificial advantage by giving them the benefit of the doubt.

    Who could ever have predicted that that would go wrong...

    Anyone ever introduced to the concept of "affirmative action"... where people are judged by the color of their skin rather than the content of their character.