Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday October 20 2019, @08:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the sounds-fishy-to-me dept.

Could you taste the difference between cod and other whitefish, such as haddock or hake, if you didn't know what you were eating? The answer may have implications for supporting local fisheries and food sustainability in New England, says UMass Amherst environmental conservation graduate student Amanda Davis.

A research fellow at the UMass Amherst-based Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, Davis is exploring the reactions of UMass Amherst students and staff, born between 1980 and 2000, in a scientific sensory evaluation of five different whitefish sourced straight from the Boston Fish Pier: cod, dogfish, haddock, hake and pollock.

The study, funded by a seed grant from the UMass Amherst Institute for Social Science Research, is designed to explore "name bias" in seafood choices. Davis will present results in January at the winter science meeting of the American Fisheries Society's Southern New England Chapter in Cambridge.

The whitefish study grew out of Davis's interest in promoting local, sustainable seafood in New England. She is director of Our Wicked Fish, a newly founded, Deerfield-based nonprofit that strives to revitalize New England's fishing industry by educating consumers and connecting them with local seafood options.

It might come as a surprise, Davis notes, that despite the storied tradition of New England's fisheries—Cape Cod was named after the once-abundant fish, after all—most seafood offered in the Northeast U.S. today is imported. "We want to change that," Davis says. "How can we get consumers interested in eating whitefish other than cod? Hake, pollock and haddock taste as good and are not as expensive."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday October 22 2019, @02:23AM

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday October 22 2019, @02:23AM (#910121)

    Are you sure about that?

    Where I live, we are told we have "the most sustainable fisheries in the world" due to a very strict catch limit regime.

    The reality is that it doesn't matter what rules are put in place, in terms of reduced catches and by-catch limits, the fishing industry continues to cheat, and fish populations are really hard to measure.

    It actually turns out that what we hear is mostly propaganda, produced by the fishing industry, with the connivance of the regulators.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2