Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday October 22 2019, @08:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the supply-and-demand dept.

Boeing's 737 Max troubles deepen, taking airlines, suppliers with it:

Boeing shares continued their slide Monday after explosive messages last week revealed a top pilot had concerns about a system on the 737 Max that was later implicated in two fatal crashes.

Several Wall Street analysts downgraded Boeing, fretting about the fallout from the crisis that has barred the manufacturer from delivering its best-selling planes that make up around 40% of its profit.

Boeing's stock was down 3.8% Monday afternoon, shaving more than 80 points off the Dow Jones Industrial Average, but had pared losses from earlier in the session

The messages made public Friday included an exchange from a top Boeing pilot to a colleague in 2016 that expressed his worries about an aggressive flight control system on the Max, whose performance he called "egregious." The pilot, who now works for Southwest, said in the exchange that he "unknowingly" lied to regulators. That same pilot months later told the FAA to remove the system, known as MCAS, from pilot procedures and training materials.

The FAA said Boeing knew about the messages for months and scolded Boeing in a letter for not releasing the documents earlier. Boeing defended its training materials for the 737 Max, which regulators deemed safe in 2017, and said it told regulators on "multiple occasions" about the broadened capabilities of the now-questioned system.

[...]Boeing's board is holding a regularly scheduled meeting in San Antonio that concludes Monday, a spokesman said. The board stripped CEO Dennis Muilenburg of his chairmanship on Oct. 11 to focus on getting the Max back into service.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Wednesday October 23 2019, @02:49PM

    by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us (6553) on Wednesday October 23 2019, @02:49PM (#910808) Journal

    Yeah but the big key on the 737 was that to mount those engines they had to set those bigger engines further ahead, which changed the aerodynamics, specifically which led to the issues at hand....

    But for Airbus... yeah it seems weird. Then you see the Trent XWB's on the 350 are 16,640 lbs (33,280# for a pair) where the Trent 556's on the 340-600 are 10,660 pounds (42,640# for four) Better thrust out of the four engines but it chews through 26 liters of fuel per nmi (max fuel load / published range which is a stupid comparison because you don't get max range from full tanks but...) where the 350 burns 18.27 liters per nmi, and the 350 carries less overall fuel yet gets better range. So yeah, they sacrificed a little passenger load for a a lighter and more clean-burning aircraft.

    But then again, the 340 and 350 don't share type rating (although the 330 and 350 do....)

    --
    This sig for rent.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2