Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday October 23 2019, @04:37AM   Printer-friendly
from the Atari-Battlezone-IRL dept.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/10/robo-tank-army-picks-contenders-for-robotic-combat-vehicle-competition/:

On October 18, the National Advanced Mobility Consortium—an organization of industry and academic researchers contracted by the US government to develop autonomous ground systems for the military—announced the selection of four companies to build prototype light robotic combat vehicles for the US Army. These are "non-developmental" prototypes, meaning they're based on existing technologies that could be turned into deployable systems with relatively minor modifications.

The Robotic Combat Vehicle-Light (RCV-L) program is part of the Army Futures Command's Next Generation Combat Vehicle effort. It seeks to provide soldiers in mechanized infantry and armor units with robotic "wingmen" that extend their reach and effectiveness on the battlefield. The Army hopes to have prototypes of the RCV-L as well as a heavier vehicle (the Robotic Combat Vehicle-Medium) in full testing in 2020. Two of each design will be fielded as "platoons" for testing, with the goal of wide deployment of tankbots by 2028.

Working in concert with new crewed combat vehicles, the robotic vehicles would provide additional sensors and firepower to bring to bear on an enemy in the field. By using robots to make the "first contact" with an enemy, unit commanders would be given more time to make decisions before committing human soldiers to the fight—or at least, that's the doctrinal thinking behind the Army's robotic combat crew goals.

The four companies chosen to develop the first prototypes are HDT Global, Oshkosh Defense, QinetiQ, and Textron. Each has already fielded some combination of ground vehicle and robotic systems—some of which have already been evaluated in some form by the Army.

Tankbots seems like a good name for a dystopian sci-fi movie to me.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Wednesday October 23 2019, @07:30PM (1 child)

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday October 23 2019, @07:30PM (#910952) Journal

    IIUC, the original idea of a BOLO was a cyborg. Anyone planning to volunteer?

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by jman on Thursday October 24 2019, @10:40AM

    by jman (6085) Subscriber Badge on Thursday October 24 2019, @10:40AM (#911163) Homepage

    IIRC, David Weber did a nice history of the Bolo. They were not cyborgs at first, but grew that way. The last story was around nine thousand years from now...