Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday October 23 2019, @09:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the low-lying-qubits dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

The esoteric world of quantum computing is all aquiver following a robust blog post from IBM essentially rubbishing claims from Google that it has achieved "quantum supremacy".

The post notes that quantum computing is approaching the limits of classical simulation and there are big questions as to how to evaluate and benchmark system performance. Quantum supremacy is the moment quantum machines begin to do things classical computers cannot.

But Big Blue dismissed Google's most recent claims for its 53-qubit processor revealed in a leaked document last month.

IBM notes: "In the preprint, it is argued that their device reached 'quantum supremacy' and that 'a state-of-the-art supercomputer would require approximately 10,000 years to perform the equivalent task'. "We argue that an ideal simulation of the same task can be performed on a classical system in 2.5 days and with far greater fidelity. This is in fact a conservative, worst-case estimate, and we expect that with additional refinements, the classical cost of the simulation can be further reduced."

IBM blog post.

Previously:

IBM and Google’s Race for Quantum Computing Takes a Mysterious Turn
Google Quantum Processor Reportedly Achieves Quantum Supremacy

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Coward, Anonymous on Wednesday October 23 2019, @01:08PM (1 child)

    by Coward, Anonymous (7017) on Wednesday October 23 2019, @01:08PM (#910780) Journal

    Aaronson did not endorse any claims that quantum supremacy had been reached. He just argued that it would be a big deal.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by FatPhil on Wednesday October 23 2019, @04:46PM

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Wednesday October 23 2019, @04:46PM (#910864) Homepage
    He seems to be using a different definition of the term from the guy who coined the term.

    I remain in superposition about whether it would be a big deal or not.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves