Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 25 2019, @07:44AM   Printer-friendly
from the buttery-males dept.

White House kicks infosec team to curb in IT office shakeup

An internal White House memo published today by Axios reveals that recent changes to the information operations and security organizations there have left the security team in tumult, with many members headed for the door. And the chief of the White House's computer network defense branch—who wrote the memo after submitting his resignation—warned that the White House was likely headed toward another network compromise and theft of data.

The White House Office of the Chief Information Security Officer was set up after the 2014 breach of an unclassified White House network by Russian intelligence—a breach discovered by a friendly foreign government. But in a July reorganization, the OCISO was dissolved and its duties placed under the White House Office of the Chief Information Officer, led by CIO Ben Pauwels and Director of White House IT Roger L. Stone. Stone was pulled from the ranks of the National Security Council where he was deputy senior director for resilience policy. (Stone is not related to indicted Republican political consultant Roger J. Stone.)

[...] "It is my express opinion that the remaining incumbent OCISO staff is being systematically targeted for removal from the Office of Administration," departing White House network defense branch chief Dimitrios Vastakis wrote in the memo. The security team had seen incentive pay revoked, scope of duties cut, and access to systems and facilities reduced, Vastakis noted. Staffers' "positions with strategic and tactical decision making authorities" had also been revoked. "In addition, habitually being hostile to incumbent OCISO staff has become a staple tactic for the new leadership... it has forced the majority of [senior civil servant] OCISO staff to resign."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Spamalope on Friday October 25 2019, @06:46PM

    by Spamalope (5233) on Friday October 25 2019, @06:46PM (#911787) Homepage

    Improper possession of classified documents was proven. That's all that's needed for a conviction. Spoliation of evidence enhances that.
    Politics and finality both weigh heavily when it comes to Hillary.

    Similar facts for a person not politically connected would result in jail time. Political power, and the BS games already played both make the situation as it sits a mud pit.

    I'm far less interested in the document handling than I am that she was concealing her business communication while Sec State. That's an offense, specifically to make it harder to hide corruption. Taken with the appearance of impropriety when (as an example) the Saudis make donations to the Clinton Foundation ahead of State dept policy that favors them...

    I'd like to see an audit of the Clinton foundation, Hillary's emails and State Dept. policy to either clear the air or deal with the dirty laundry. But who the hell could you trust to do that impartially? It'd be political all the way in practice... (both parties have been caught in enough lies that default distrust seems reasonable)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2