SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the you-don't-know-the-power-of-the-dark-mode dept.
Submitted via IRC for soylent_brown
The Dark Mode craze may do more harm than good – this is why
The hot new topic in terms of smartphone and computer software right now is Dark Mode, an optional system look that flips the colors of an app or operating system to make it, well, dark. Instagram has a dark mode, as does Chrome, WhatsApp, Gmail, and iOS 13, and it seems apps and developers are tripping over themselves to create a new dark mode for their software.
There's just one problem which none of these hard-working people seem to have considered that makes their work redundant, and the attention they've taken from other projects will be in vain: all in all, dark mode looks totally awful.
That's not a dig at any dark mode in particular, and no developers have implemented it particularly poorly (well, apart from Android 10). But in the rush for developers to see if they could implement dark mode on their apps, no-one asked if they should - and taken stock of how it might be reworked better rather than just following the trend.
Beyond that, there are legitimate reasons why developers shouldn't be focusing on Dark Mode. Here's why the Dark Mode craze is just crazy.
So dear soylentils, do you use dark mode on your applications, and why or why not?
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 26 2019, @03:35PM (2 children)
Yes, how soon we forget. Although in this case the origins of black text on maximum white (rgb(255,255,255)) backgrounds arose about 25 years ago now, so many of the new crop of users just discovering this newfangled dark mode were not around to remember the days before WYSISYG created the bright white we have now.
For you youngins, the current bright white that is now being replaced by the "dark mode" fad was created so that the computer screen would look like it was a printed sheet of paper. Of course, the microsoft and apple idiots who dreamed it up failed to take into account that there was a significant difference between a sheet of paper reflecting room light at X lux, and a CRT phosphor screen flickering at 60Hz or 72Hz at max brightness also showing X lux. One was easy to read (the paper) one was an eye-strain inducing crap mess (the super bright flickering CRT). It was not until LCD monitors arrived that bright white backgrounds became reasonably tolerable, and even then only once the brightness was turned down enough that one was not looking directly into the sun while using them.
But, before the above, dark mode (or something less than "solar corona") was actually the norm.
Also, ever notice how fashion trends seem to go on a 25-30 year cycle....
It's been about 25-30 years since "fake paper" bright white mode, guess what, the fashion trend is just going back to what we had before.
Sadly, the new crop, who never even knew a time before "bright white" are screwing up their dark modes to the point that their dark modes are just as useless as the bright white modes they are pushing back against. Black background with 1 pixel wide strokes of white on fonts is just as unreadable as a bright white background with 1 pixel wide strokes of black on those same fonts.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by vux984 on Sunday October 27 2019, @03:13AM (1 child)
before wysiwyg white-mode all the editors I spent a lot of time in were trending from grey/white on black to grey / white / yellow text on blue backgrounds.
Wordperfect 6
Borland C++
Norton Commander
IIRC all had that color scheme as the default. I found it fine at the time, although lately there is this whole freakout about blue light so i find that interesting.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Sunday October 27 2019, @05:45PM
People forget that early web browsers from both Microsoft and Netscape defaulted to a light grey background and you had to set the body background attribute to #ffffff to get a white background.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.