Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Sunday October 27 2019, @04:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the got-what-they-were-looking-for-from-search-results-page? dept.

A few months ago, back in August, the Web passed a milestone in that less than half of Google searches result in even a single click onwards. In other words, the majority of searchers never left Google after seeing the results. That could be a warning that Google is transitioning from a search engine to more of a walled-garden. Or it could mean that the results aren't good any more and people move on to other engines after only a quick glance. If the former, where searches are no longer resulting in click through, then what should be the proper response from the Web at large?

From: Less than Half of Google Searches Now Result in a Click:

On desktop, things haven’t changed all that much in the last three years. Organic is down a few percent, paid and zero-click are up a bit, but June of 2019 isn’t far off January of 2016.

On mobile, where more than half of all searches take place, it’s a different story. Organic has fallen by almost 20%, while paid has nearly tripled and zero-click searches are up significantly. Even way back in January 2016, more than half of mobile searches ended without a click. Today’s, it’s almost 2/3rds.

Three trends are made clear by these numbers:

  1. The percent of searches available as organic traffic from Google is steadily declining, especially on mobile.
  2. Paid clicks tend to increase whenever Google makes changes to how those results are displayed, then slowly decline as searchers get more familiar with spotting and avoiding them.
  3. Google’s ongoing attempts to answer more searches without a click to any results OR a click to Google’s own properties are both proving successful. As a result, zero-click searches, and clicks that bring searchers to a Google-owned site keep rising.

And, from: Over 50% of Google searches result in no clicks, data shows:

Even worse, it seems this trend towards zero-click searches has seen steady growth since 2016. In the meantime, organic reach for third-party websites has continued to shrink. To be fair, it's not all that surprising that a large number of searches result in no clicks – especially when we factor in that Google has been shifting its attention to summing up results in snippets at the top of Search. While those might be easier to scan for users, they do eat into third-party websites' traffic. We've reached out to Google for comment, but have yet to hear back. We'll update this post accordingly, if we do. However, as Fishkin points out, a US congressional panel recently asked Google if it was true that less than 50 percent of searches lead to non-Google websites. It was a simple Yes-No question, but the Big G eschewed giving a direct response. Instead, it took a dig at the authenticity of the data cited – without denying it.

Previously:
Google Removes Image Search Buttons to Appease Getty Images (2018)
Google Kills Off Search-As-You-Type (2017)
HTTPS Introduced as Google Search Ranking Criterion (2014)
Google Downranking The Pirate Bay Searches (2014)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 27 2019, @11:41AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 27 2019, @11:41AM (#912385)

    That could be a warning that Google is transitioning from a search engine to more of a walled-garden

    That is not a walled garden. There aren't any walls.

    That doesn't mean it's problem-free, of course. It is a little like when newspapers complained about getting listed by Google (because they'd rather... not be indexed and get referred traffic? People spent enormous effort trying to get what news sources were getting for free. I never understood this). Except for real this time. If Google takes your content, displays it on their own search results page, and thereby prevents that search from actually going to your website, that's denying you your own traffic and possible ad revenue. The solution of course is for Google to pay you if this happens, not for everyone to somehow try to prevent it.

    But of course, Google having to pay other websites will just encourage them to try to provide that content themselves, sort of like when they copied lyrics from ... uh, whoever it is they copied them from, and then tried to pass them off as their own (complete with trap words [wikipedia.org]).

    This is the sort of thing that is only really fixed properly by breaking up Google, so that these sorts of incentives don't happen. Search fundamentally needs to be separate from content.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1