Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Sunday October 27 2019, @04:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the got-what-they-were-looking-for-from-search-results-page? dept.

A few months ago, back in August, the Web passed a milestone in that less than half of Google searches result in even a single click onwards. In other words, the majority of searchers never left Google after seeing the results. That could be a warning that Google is transitioning from a search engine to more of a walled-garden. Or it could mean that the results aren't good any more and people move on to other engines after only a quick glance. If the former, where searches are no longer resulting in click through, then what should be the proper response from the Web at large?

From: Less than Half of Google Searches Now Result in a Click:

On desktop, things haven’t changed all that much in the last three years. Organic is down a few percent, paid and zero-click are up a bit, but June of 2019 isn’t far off January of 2016.

On mobile, where more than half of all searches take place, it’s a different story. Organic has fallen by almost 20%, while paid has nearly tripled and zero-click searches are up significantly. Even way back in January 2016, more than half of mobile searches ended without a click. Today’s, it’s almost 2/3rds.

Three trends are made clear by these numbers:

  1. The percent of searches available as organic traffic from Google is steadily declining, especially on mobile.
  2. Paid clicks tend to increase whenever Google makes changes to how those results are displayed, then slowly decline as searchers get more familiar with spotting and avoiding them.
  3. Google’s ongoing attempts to answer more searches without a click to any results OR a click to Google’s own properties are both proving successful. As a result, zero-click searches, and clicks that bring searchers to a Google-owned site keep rising.

And, from: Over 50% of Google searches result in no clicks, data shows:

Even worse, it seems this trend towards zero-click searches has seen steady growth since 2016. In the meantime, organic reach for third-party websites has continued to shrink. To be fair, it's not all that surprising that a large number of searches result in no clicks – especially when we factor in that Google has been shifting its attention to summing up results in snippets at the top of Search. While those might be easier to scan for users, they do eat into third-party websites' traffic. We've reached out to Google for comment, but have yet to hear back. We'll update this post accordingly, if we do. However, as Fishkin points out, a US congressional panel recently asked Google if it was true that less than 50 percent of searches lead to non-Google websites. It was a simple Yes-No question, but the Big G eschewed giving a direct response. Instead, it took a dig at the authenticity of the data cited – without denying it.

Previously:
Google Removes Image Search Buttons to Appease Getty Images (2018)
Google Kills Off Search-As-You-Type (2017)
HTTPS Introduced as Google Search Ranking Criterion (2014)
Google Downranking The Pirate Bay Searches (2014)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by Walzmyn on Sunday October 27 2019, @11:41AM (3 children)

    by Walzmyn (987) on Sunday October 27 2019, @11:41AM (#912386)

    yeah.
    But for every one case like yours how many hundred are just looking for the time of the Packers game or how many inches in a meter, which are all right on the Google results page? That's the source of the decline mentioned in TFA.

    Although your use case may prove Google is becoming useless, it's not what's driving this.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by Common Joe on Sunday October 27 2019, @01:08PM (1 child)

    by Common Joe (33) <common.joe.0101NO@SPAMgmail.com> on Sunday October 27 2019, @01:08PM (#912402) Journal

    I don't know. It could be both. Some people google just the weather one time and then get on the bus to go to work while a programmer hammers Google relentlessly. Without seeing IP Addresses (or other uniquely identifying information) it's hard to tell.

    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Sunday October 27 2019, @07:55PM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Sunday October 27 2019, @07:55PM (#912510)

      And any decent statistical method will strip out the OCD programmers who read page 10 of their search results as anomalous outliers...

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 2) by mhajicek on Sunday October 27 2019, @04:41PM

    by mhajicek (51) on Sunday October 27 2019, @04:41PM (#912453)

    I'll use it to check the spelling of a word.

    --
    The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek