Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday October 28 2019, @07:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the have-you-got-a-light-bud? dept.

Submitted via IRC for AzumaHazuki

Missouri man flies to California, sets 13 wildfires, then tries to fly home, cops say

A Missouri man flew to California, spent two days setting wildfires, then tried to fly home, officials say. He was arrested Monday.

Freddie Graham, 68, hopped on a flight from Missouri to San Jose last Thursday, KPIX reported. After renting a car, he spent the next two days setting fires as he drove the “narrow, windy roads” between Ed Levin Park and the Calaveras Reservoir in the foothills near San Jose, Deputy District Attorney Bud Porter said.

Officials say Graham would light pieces of paper on fire and then toss them out of his window as he drove, The East Bay Times reported. He’s believed to have set at least 13 fires — four on Friday and nine on Saturday — which are collectively referred to as the Reservoir Fire, officials say.

It took hours for firefighters to put out Friday’s blazes, officials say, but Saturday’s proved even more tenacious, taking firefighters the rest of the weekend to extinguish them, The East Bay Times reported. The fire burned more than 128 acres, though no injuries or damaged structures were reported.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Monday October 28 2019, @10:32PM (4 children)

    by Freeman (732) on Monday October 28 2019, @10:32PM (#912994) Journal

    Stupid, reckless, and dangerous, are good words to describe what he allegedly did. No one was killed or injured from the fires he lit. Where do you get the "THIS deserves the death penalty" from? Now, if you're a treehugger member of green peace, I could see your point.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 29 2019, @09:04AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 29 2019, @09:04AM (#913197)

    Stupid, reckless, and dangerous, are good words to describe what he allegedly did. No one was killed or injured from the fires he lit. Where do you get the "THIS deserves the death penalty" from?

    So if some idiot starts shooting off randomly in some city from a machine gun, it's all ok, unless someone is killed?

    This is the same sort of shit. Total disregard for safety of others for his own fucked up amusement. I don't support death penalty per say, but life in jail for this? Fuck yes.

    • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Wednesday October 30 2019, @02:42PM

      by Freeman (732) on Wednesday October 30 2019, @02:42PM (#913716) Journal

      Nowhere did I mention that what the alleged arsonist did was okay. I'm just pointing out that the death penalty is an excessive response. Yes, the death penalty for an idiot randomly firing a machine gun is excessive, if no one's been killed. Also, firing a machine gun in a city at random isn't quite comparing apples to apples with regards to this story. Considering his age, 20 years might still be life in jail.

      --
      Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DutchUncle on Tuesday October 29 2019, @01:12PM (1 child)

    by DutchUncle (5370) on Tuesday October 29 2019, @01:12PM (#913252)

    I stand by my original description, along with yours: "Stupid, reckless, and dangerous" to the point of "depraved indifference to human life." Had he been camping and made a cookfire (also against the rules under the current fire-risk conditions), and lost control of it, I might go with just "stupid, reckless"; tossing lit cigarettes out the window, "moronic and reckless"; but the witness report suggests deliberately trying to start random wildfires, which endangers everyone in the area, and especially endangers the firefighters who will be called to deal with it. I firmly believe that impact assessment of such actions should be multiplied by the breadth of the impact, because I'm really tired of excuses about "minor vandalism" cases that disrupt the lives of thousands or millions of people (messing with train brakes or track switches, stealing cables for the scrap metal value) and that would be considered sabotage or terrorism if done during wartime.

    • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Wednesday October 30 2019, @02:37PM

      by Freeman (732) on Wednesday October 30 2019, @02:37PM (#913713) Journal

      The guy isn't getting random vandalism charges thrown at him, though. He's being charged with felonies that were designed to combat this kind of thing. If you can't see the difference between a rapist, murderer, arsonist, or a teenager who's spray painting graffiti, that's your own problem. Arson can definitely lead to homicide and/or murder, but in this case it's not clear that he intended to kill anyone.

      --
      Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"