Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.

PHP Bug Allows RCE on NGINX Servers

posted by janrinok on Tuesday October 29 2019, @08:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the update-your-versions dept.

upstart writes:

Submitted via IRC for Fnord666

PHP Bug Allows RCE on NGINX Servers

A buffer underflow bug in PHP could allow remote code-execution (RCE) on targeted NGINX servers.

First discovered during a hCorem Capture the Flag competition in September, the bug (CVE-2019-11043) exists in the FastCGI directive used in some PHP implementations on NGINX servers, according to researchers at Wallarm.

PHP powers about 30 percent of modern websites, including popular web platforms like WordPress and Drupal – but NGINX servers are only vulnerable if they have PHP-FPM enabled (a non-default optimization feature that allows servers to execute scripts faster). The issue is patched in PHP versions 7.3.11, 7.2.24 and 7.1.33, which were released last week.

In a Monday posting, Wallarm researchers said that the bug can be exploited by sending specially crafted packets to the server by using the “fastcgi_split_path” directive in the NGINX configuration file. That file is configured to process user data, such as a URL. If an attacker creates a special URL that includes a “%0a” (newline) byte, the server will send back more data than it should, which confuses the FastCGI mechanism.

“In particular, [the bug can be exploited] in a fastcgi_split_path directive and a regexp trick with newlines,” according to Wallarm security researcher Andrew Danau, who found the bug. “Because of %0a character, NGINX will set an empty value to this variable, and fastcgi+PHP will not expect this....[as a result], it’s possible to put [in] arbitrary FastCGI variables, like PHP_VALUE.”

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
PHP Bug Allows RCE on NGINX Servers | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 8 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 29 2019, @11:27PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 29 2019, @11:27PM (#913493)

    Q: "Why would you interpose a whole interpretive language that has access to the whole system between yourself and the program you actually want to run?"

    A: Millennial programmers.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 30 2019, @12:58AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 30 2019, @12:58AM (#913515)

    Considering FastCGI specification was released in 1995, I doubt that it was the idea of Millennials. Well, unless you think a lot of sub-14-year-olds made the major design decisions in Massachusetts-based ecommerce companies.