Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Thursday October 31 2019, @03:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the starlink-bait dept.

AT&T will slash $3 billion off its capital investments next year

AT&T is planning to spend just $20 billion on capital investment in 2020, down from $23 billion this year. [...] The company is on pace to exceed its 2019 goal as it averaged more than $6 billion per quarter in the first three quarters. But with a forecast of $20 billion across all of 2020, AT&T expects to spend about $5 billion per quarter on capital investments going forward. The company is under pressure from investors to control spending, in part because its TV business is tanking and because of AT&T's giant debt load stemming from the purchases of DirecTV and Time Warner.

[...] AT&T's capital spending will decline next year despite the company's plan to roll 5G mobile service out nationwide. AT&T already got much of the 5G spending out of the way by purchasing spectrum licenses, and AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson told investors that the company's "strong spectrum position will allow for lower capital intensity" over the next three years.

AT&T has also mostly stopped its fiber-to-the-home broadband construction even though large portions of its 21-state territory still have only copper-based DSL service. Fiber deployment isn't stopping completely, as Stephenson said that "5G requires us to continue deploying fiber." But AT&T customers who can't get modern broadband speeds or reliable wireline service in their homes would welcome more capital investment in their neighborhoods.

Related: AT&T Lays Off Thousands After Nabbing Billions In Tax Breaks And Regulatory Favors
AT&T Will Give Poor People 1.5 Mbps DSL for $10 if US Allows DirecTV Merger
AT&T Employees Took Bribes to Plant Malware on the Company's Network
AT&T Turns On 5G In New York, But It Still Isn't Available To Consumers
Lawsuit: AT&T Signed Customers Up for DirecTV Now Without Their Knowledge
AT&T Considers Getting Rid of DirecTV as TV Business Tanks, WSJ Reports


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by sjames on Thursday October 31 2019, @09:09AM (2 children)

    by sjames (2882) on Thursday October 31 2019, @09:09AM (#914071) Journal

    Can someone explain again how allowing more mergers and slashing network neutrality will surely increase investment in infrastructure?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Thursday October 31 2019, @11:05AM

    by deimtee (3272) on Thursday October 31 2019, @11:05AM (#914081) Journal

    Well, it lets you pay hundreds of millions to the CEO's and board members. How can you expect them to produce their best work without an incentive?

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday October 31 2019, @01:49PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday October 31 2019, @01:49PM (#914101)

    Somehow, any company that carries the name AT&T also carries the inherently evil spirit that grew in the original monopoly. Let it die, it's entirely redundant these days.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]