Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Friday November 01 2019, @11:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the Lead-in-the-Hold dept.

In a sort of a reversal of the problem that Clair Patterson had, wherein, as you will recall, his research was contaminated by environmental lead, originating in gasoline additives, researchers attempting delicate studies of very far away phenomena need shielding, namely lead, that is not contaminated by radioactivity.
Fine article available at The Atlantic.

In 2017, Chamkaur Ghag, a physicist at University College London, got an email from a colleague in Spain with a tempting offer. The year before, an emeritus professor at Princeton University, Frank Calaprice, had learned of old Spanish ships that had sunk off the New Jersey coast 400 or 500 years ago, while carrying a cargo of lead. Calaprice obtained a few samples of this lead and sent it off to Spain, where a lab buried within the Pyrenees tested its radioactivity. It was low: just what Aldo Ianni, the then-director of the Canfranc Underground Laboratory, was hoping for. Now that sunken lead was being offered to any physics laboratory willing to pay 20 euros per kilogram—a fairly high price—for it.
        Lead is mined and refined all over the world, but that centuries-old lead, sitting in a shipwreck, has a rare quality. Having sat deep underwater since before the United States of America was born, its natural radioactivity has decayed to a point where it's no longer spitting out particles. For particle physicists, that makes it exceptionally valuable.

Source of radioactive contaminants in lead? Yes, you guessed it!

Take steel: It's an excellent shield from intruding vagabond particles—so much so that Fermilab, a particle-physics and accelerator laboratory in Illinois, has used tons of it in the past few decades to shield its own experiments, says Valerie Higgins, Fermilab's historian and archivist. That steel frequently came from decommissioned warships, many of which existed around the time of, or served in, the Second World War or the Korean War, including the Astoria, the Roanoke, the Wasp, the Philippine Sea, and the Baltimore.

The timing of those conflicts matters. At 5:29 a.m. on July 16, 1945, the first-ever nuclear-device detonation took place in the Jornada del Muerto desert, in New Mexico. The atomic age had begun, and with each subsequent nuclear fireball, more radioactive fallout was sprinkled over the world.

During the Cold War, that radioactive atmospheric contamination got effortlessly sucked into blast furnaces when steel was made, Duffy says. This infused the final product with radiation, making it unsuitable for many physics experiments.

Thus the market in sunken lead. And a conflict between astrophysics and archeaology. Ah, science!


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by stormwyrm on Saturday November 02 2019, @06:44AM (1 child)

    by stormwyrm (717) on Saturday November 02 2019, @06:44AM (#914983) Journal

    I wonder if it would be possible to adapt technology previously used for uranium enrichment to separate out the non-radioactive lead from a sample of modern lead. Pb-210 is probably the most problematic since it has a half-life of 22 years, and this is likely the biggest contaminant they're concerned with. Pb-202 is entirely synthetic, so there probably isn't a lot of it from freshly mined and refined lead even if it does have a half-life of 50,000 years. Pb-205 has a half-life of 17 million years, so there probably is still a significant quantity of it even in samples mined and smelted before the atomic age, but its long half-life also means it isn't such a big radioactive source. The next longest compared to Pb-210 is Pb-209 with a half-life of three hours, and the rest are even shorter-lived so they are probably inconsequential. It probably would be possible to create a sample of lead which contains largely the non-radioactive isotopes (Pb-206, 207 and 208) and negligible amounts of anything else using a gas centrifuge or similar apparatus like what is used to enrich U-235 from natural uranium, but it's probably more expensive to do so than it would be to buy lead from a sunken ship at €20/kg.

    --
    Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by dry on Saturday November 02 2019, @05:14PM

    by dry (223) on Saturday November 02 2019, @05:14PM (#915060) Journal

    Besides price, most governments wouldn't let the technology become common as it could be so easily re-purposed to uranium enrichment.