Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday November 04 2019, @01:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the kewl dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Because Internet makes a linguist's case for l33t speak, other online-text fads

The Internet has done good things to the English language.

That's the most important thing linguist Gretchen McCulloch has to say in her book, Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. Though many prominent opinion-havers rage about the imminent death of the English language at the hands of emoji-wielding teenagers, the Internet has done no more harm to English than television, radio, or dime novels.

In fact, McCulloch makes a compelling argument that Internet language, and emoji in particular, is restoring life to the relatively emotionless medium of text. For hundreds of years, public writing was limited to formal contexts like newspapers and books, written by educated people using very formal language for the edification of other educated people. Even fiction draws a clear line between informal dialogue and formal narration. On the Internet, on the other hand, the lines are much less clear. Private, informal writing (like shopping lists or notes passed between students at the back of a classroom) is now publicly visible, and the conventions developed by individuals or small groups for writing informally can spread and interact on a global scale. To McCulloch, this is more exciting than it is scary, and reading Because Internet might convince you to feel the same.

[...] McCulloch is on a mission to make linguistics relatable—and, hear me out, she's on a roll in that respect. She does this not only through Because Internet, but also through Lingthusiasm, the podcast she co-hosts with fellow linguist Lauren Gawne. As its name suggests, Lingthusiasm shows off the hosts' enthusiasm about linguistics and calls on its listeners to get excited about a wide variety of linguistic topics, such as how vowels work, the ways people from different cultures talk about time, and why efforts to create a single world language never catch on. On Lingthusiasm, McCulloch and Gawne dispel myths about language and inspire the kind of excitement that turns curious students into scientists. And in Because Internet, McCulloch continues to demystify and delight.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday November 04 2019, @04:18PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 04 2019, @04:18PM (#915756) Journal

    COBOL syntax is modeled after the English, has sentences and paragraphs. And keywords.

    Yep, I understand that.

    The purpose of this was normal people, who never witnessed computers before, could start programming practical stuff very quickly.

    That was a goal, yes. In practice it was not achieved. Certainly not in what I have witnessed. I think this is also evidenced by the fact that we don't appear to have hoards of (real) programmers who got their start in COBOL. At least I've never met one, or even heard of one.

    By "real programmers", I do not mean the "Learn Java/C/C++/Python in 24 hours For Dummies!" variety.

    And understand well what other people coded.

    I think it was somewhat successful in achieving that goal.

    Also, these same things can be said for HyperTalk / AppleScript. I would argue that those two read even more like natural English than COBOL. Yet they are mode decidedly NOT natural English.

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2