Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday November 06 2019, @11:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the just-switch-off-and-start-it-again dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1337

In review of fatal Arizona crash, U.S. agency says Uber software had flaws

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An Uber self-driving test vehicle that struck and killed an Arizona woman in 2018 had software flaws, the National Transportation Safety Board said Tuesday as it disclosed the company’s autonomous test vehicles were involved in 37 crashes over the prior 18 months.

NTSB may use the findings from the first fatal self-driving car accident to make recommendations that could impact how the entire industry addresses self-driving software issues or to regulators about how to oversee the industry.

The board will meet Nov. 19 to determine the probable cause of the March 2018 accident in Tempe, Arizona that killed 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg as she was walking a bicycle across a street at night.

In a report released ahead of the meeting, the NTSB said the Uber Technologies Inc vehicle had failed to properly identify her as a pedestrian crossing a street.

That accident prompted significant safety concerns about the nascent self-driving car industry, which is working to get vehicles into commercial use.

In the aftermath of the crash, Uber suspended all testing and did not resume until December in Pennsylvania with revised software and significant new restrictions and safeguards,

A spokeswoman for Uber's self-driving car effort, Sarah Abboud, said the company regretted the crash that killed Herzberg and noted it has “adopted critical program improvements to further prioritize safety. We deeply value the thoroughness of the NTSB's investigation into the crash and look forward to reviewing their recommendations.”

The NTSB reported at least two prior crashes in which Uber test vehicles may not have identified roadway hazards. The NTSB said between September 2016 and March 2018, there were 37 crashes of Uber vehicles in autonomous mode, including 33 that involved another vehicle striking test vehicles.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Snotnose on Thursday November 07 2019, @01:55AM (2 children)

    by Snotnose (1623) on Thursday November 07 2019, @01:55AM (#917099)

    Peds have the right of way on any urban street (not on limited access freeways, etc, of course).

    Don't really give a flying fuck. 200 lb pedestrian at 2 MPH vs 2000 lb car at 40 MPH means the pedestrian loses. Don't care if they had the right of way or not. Hell, lets put that on their tombstone: "She had the right of way".

    If you cross a street and don't look for oncoming traffic then you are just waiting to be Darwinned.

    --
    Why shouldn't we judge a book by it's cover? It's got the author, title, and a summary of what the book's about.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 07 2019, @02:17AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 07 2019, @02:17AM (#917106)

    Yep. We're going to put it on your tombstone. "He had the right of way."

    Gonna order your tombstone now because with your attitude, you're likely to be dead real soon.