Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday November 07 2019, @02:55AM   Printer-friendly
from the I'd-call-and-complain...oh dept.

Submitted via IRC for exec

FCC crackdown on cellphone subsidies leaves millions without service

The Ajit Pai-era FCC has spent much of its energy cracking down on claimed abuses of the Lifeline subsidy program, but this anti-fraud effort may be hurting low-income households more than it helps. The investigative news outlet Center for Public Integrity has used FCC data to determine that nationwide enrollment for cellphone subsidies has dropped by about 2.3 million people, or 21 percent, since 2017. The cuts have been particularly severe in places like the District of Columbia, where 49 percent of Lifeline users lost their subsidies between March 2018 and June 2019. Mississippi, Wyoming and Puerto Rico also lost a third or more of their enrollment in the same time frame.

Some of the problems may stem from a verifier system that was approved in 2016. It was meant to automatically check whether people qualified for Lifeline service and reduce fraud, but its incomplete access to benefit databases appears to have rejected people who were eligible for the program. Enrollment has plunged in those six states where the verifier launched, although a connection to the Medicaid database (and ideally state databases) might solve some of these problems.

However, the current FCC's crackdown (including ongoing support of the verifier) is raising concerns that it's simply interested in cutting off support for poor people, in sync with a presidency that has focused on cutting other benefits for low-income homes. There are particular concerns that changes due in December may prompt carriers to quit Lifeline and leave customers without access. Networks are supposed to help Lifeline recipients by providing more data and phasing out support for call minutes, but they're expected to complain when the subsidy amounts to less than $10 per month.

Based on a story from USA Today


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jasassin on Friday November 08 2019, @05:37AM (1 child)

    by jasassin (3566) <jasassin@gmail.com> on Friday November 08 2019, @05:37AM (#917785) Homepage Journal

    I'm butthurt that they don't want to earn their ability to walk and talk like the rest of us. They want me to fucking pay for it. They want me to work harder so they don't have to. Fuck them.

    There are numerous reasons why geriatric people can't walk, and there's no earning that ability back when you get that old with conditions that simply arise from old age.

    Also, being as we've done without them for around two hundred millennia, your argument is shit.

    You mean back when generations lived in the same small village? Times have changed. People live further away from their parents and grandparents. It's no longer a matter of waiting for the hunter gatherer to come back. Your argument is shit.

    --
    jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0xE6462C68A9A3DB5A
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday November 08 2019, @11:25PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Friday November 08 2019, @11:25PM (#918082) Homepage Journal

    "walk and talk" were not two separate abilities but the combination of the two. If they're not mobile, they don't need their phone to be either.

    Dude, I mean the entirety of human history up to the late 90s. Something does not suddenly become necessary simply because it's convenient. And with the abysmal quality of cellular voice compared to landline voice, it's not even very fucking convenient.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.