Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday November 11 2019, @04:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-about-venus? dept.

Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956

The Hidden Cost of Gold: Birth Defects and Brain Damage

CIDAHU, Indonesia — Thousands of children with crippling birth defects. Half a million people poisoned. A toxic chemical found in the food supply. Accusations of a government cover-up and police officers on the take.

This is the legacy of Indonesia's mercury trade, a business intertwined with the lucrative and illegal production of gold.

More than a hundred nations have joined a global campaign to reduce the international trade in mercury, an element so toxic there is "no known safe level of exposure," according to health experts.

But that effort has backfired in Indonesia, where illicit backyard manufacturers have sprung up to supply wildcat miners and replace mercury that was previously imported from abroad. Now, Indonesia produces so much black-market mercury that it has become a major global supplier, surreptitiously shipping thousands of tons to other parts of the world.

Much of the mercury is destined for use in gold mining in Africa and Asia, passing through hubs such as Dubai and Singapore, according to court records — and the trade has deadly consequences.

"It is a public health crisis," said Yuyun Ismawati, a co-founder of an Indonesian environmental group, Nexus3 Foundation, and a recipient of the 2009 Goldman Environmental Prize. She has called for a worldwide ban on using mercury in gold mining.

Mercury can be highly dangerous as it accumulates up the food chain, causing a wide range of disorders, including birth defects, neurological problems and even death.

Today, despite the risks, small-scale miners using mercury operate in about 80 countries in Asia, Africa and the Americas. They produce up to 25 percent of all gold sold.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 11 2019, @01:32PM (9 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 11 2019, @01:32PM (#918914) Journal

    There will always be those who will gladly exploit people and destroy their lives for a profit. The US economic system has been based on that fact long before we were a country. Our Constitution was mainly designed to preserve and enhance slavery and oligarchy, and a surprising amount of the actual text of that document is directly the result of that simple fact.

    If that were true, then why bother with the exercise? You don't need things like balance of power, freedom of speech, or due process.

    And I think you great underestimate the virtue of systems that are aware of and come up with rules for dealing with people who "will gladly exploit people and destroy their lives for profit" rather than pretend they don't exist.

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday November 11 2019, @02:22PM (5 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 11 2019, @02:22PM (#918930) Journal

    And I think you great underestimate the virtue of systems that are aware of and come up with rules for ...

    And I think you grossly overestimate the value of that awareness and the existence of those rules so full of loopholes that they don't actually stop whoever is powerful enough to use lawyers.
    How can it be otherwise when the US political class is producing the finest politicians money can buy?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 11 2019, @09:08PM (4 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 11 2019, @09:08PM (#919079) Journal

      And I think you grossly overestimate the value of that awareness and the existence of those rules so full of loopholes that they don't actually stop whoever is powerful enough to use lawyers.

      Depends on the metric - workplace injuries and deaths have gone down for decades despite the alleged loopholes. So has pollution per capita. Loopholes don't seem to be working for the "powerful enough" there.

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by c0lo on Monday November 11 2019, @09:26PM (3 children)

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 11 2019, @09:26PM (#919093) Journal

        Depends on the metric - workplace injuries and deaths have gone down for decades despite the alleged loopholes. So has pollution per capita.

        In vase you didn't notice, so did the manufacturing and chem ind.
        I'll let you guess where and evaluate the pollution level there.

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 11 2019, @09:35PM (2 children)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 11 2019, @09:35PM (#919098) Journal

          In vase you didn't notice, so did the manufacturing and chem ind. I'll let you guess where and evaluate the pollution level there.

          So you're agreed with me and then moved the goalposts. Now we've expanded the scope from implicitly the US to the world.

          • (Score: 3, Informative) by c0lo on Monday November 11 2019, @10:39PM (1 child)

            by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 11 2019, @10:39PM (#919124) Journal

            I just pointed your argument is inconclusive due to the disputable causal relationship (even if one accepts the metrics - which I didn't. Nor did I reject them, mind you)

            --
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday November 12 2019, @12:16AM

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday November 12 2019, @12:16AM (#919159) Journal
              What's inconclusive about it? This stuff holds by sector too.
  • (Score: 2) by ilPapa on Monday November 11 2019, @08:14PM (2 children)

    by ilPapa (2366) on Monday November 11 2019, @08:14PM (#919051) Journal

    If that were true, then why bother with the exercise? You don't need things like balance of power, freedom of speech, or due process.

    None of those things exist in real life. They are fugazi. There is no balance of power if you have a lawless executive and his captive party operating completely without good faith and honor. Freedom of speech? It's funny that you think such a thing exists. Due process? Ask the hundreds of thousands of voters in Georgia who had their voting rights revoked because they live in black districts and were not notified.

    --
    You are still welcome on my lawn.
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 11 2019, @09:19PM (1 child)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 11 2019, @09:19PM (#919088) Journal

      None of those things exist in real life.

      Sounds rather like your argument doesn't exist in real life.

      There is no balance of power if you have a lawless executive and his captive party operating completely without good faith and honor.

      Not even wrong. There is no such thing as a lawless executive because their very existence is predicated on a whole lot of laws. Nor is "good faith and honor" relevant to a balance of power. If you're even thinking of relying on those things to provide a balance of power, then you're doing it wrong.

      Due process? Ask the hundreds of thousands of voters in Georgia who had their voting rights revoked because they live in black districts and were not notified.

      Right to vote is not relevant to due process which is about what is done to people who are accused of breaking laws.

      • (Score: 2) by ilPapa on Wednesday November 13 2019, @05:55AM

        by ilPapa (2366) on Wednesday November 13 2019, @05:55AM (#919730) Journal

        Right to vote is not relevant to due process

        It is if the right to vote is revoked without due process.

        And where did you get the idea that due process only applies in cases of law breaking? That's the least of it. Due process is required by the Constitution whenever someone is deprived of their rights.

        --
        You are still welcome on my lawn.