Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday November 12 2019, @11:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the with-the-power-to-tax-comes-the-power-to-destroy dept.

Amazon fails to unseat pro-tax city council members in Seattle

Amazon has suffered a setback in its own backyard as several candidates for Seattle's City Council won election despite a $1.5 million campaign by business groups to defeat them. That included Kshama Sawant, an incumbent and socialist who has been a thorn in Amazon's side in recent years. The vote was held last Tuesday, but the results only became clear in recent days.

The result is significant for Amazon because last year Seattle's city council passed a $275 per employee tax on large employers. Amazon, Starbucks, and other large Seattle businesses blasted the law and funded a ballot measure to overturn it. Facing the threat of having their law overturned by voters, the city council itself repealed the measure a month after it passed.

If business groups had defeated pro-tax candidates in last week's election, it would have made the city council very reluctant to consider taxing employers again. Instead, the election results have emboldened supporters of an "Amazon tax."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by DavePolaschek on Wednesday November 13 2019, @12:59PM

    by DavePolaschek (6129) on Wednesday November 13 2019, @12:59PM (#919809) Homepage Journal

    Not quite as stupid as it sounds. One of the problems in Seattle is that the area is full. The housing market is pretty dysfunctional and it’s nearly impossible for someone not working for a tech company to find an affordable place to live. Same sort of thing as Silicon Valley, complete with natural boundaries preventing the area from growing, plus manmade restrictions on building (open space laws) that further cut down on the places where new housing can go.

    The saner alternative would be removing some of the obstacles to building more affordable housing, but that would be political suicide due to the NIMBYs who already live there.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3