Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Saturday November 16 2019, @02:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the papa-google-knows-best dept.

Google Fixes White Screen Problem in Chrome, Admins Furious

For approximately 5 months, Google has been experimenting with a feature called WebContent Occlusion that hides the content of not-visible tabs so that they use less resources and cause less battery drain.

A Chrome developer stated that this feature caused no problems in their period of testing and on Tuesday morning Google quietly enabled it for users in Chrome 78 Stable release.

[...] While this feature was being tested on Chrome Beta users for some time, it was not properly tested in enterprise terminal server environments.

This became evident in Citrix or Terminal Server environments when a user locked their screen, every other user on that server would have their Chrome tabs suddenly become a white screen.

This happened because web occlusion was enabled in the browser for the locked screen and hid their browser content. At the same time, it also caused the content in tabs for every other user on the same terminal server to become hidden as well.

The only way to fix this was to unlock the screen, but this issue was constantly repeated as other users on the Terminal Server would once again lock their screen as they left their desk.

[...] After hundreds of reports from enterprise users who were affected by this, Chrome developer David Bienvenu stated he rolled back the change and disabled the feature.

For the rollback to take effect, users are required to restart the Chrome browser in order to pull down the new configuration.

Enterprise admins are furious that Google has the ability to quietly enable features in their environment without even a heads up and provide no way for admins to block these changes.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by RandomFactor on Sunday November 17 2019, @02:51PM

    by RandomFactor (3682) Subscriber Badge on Sunday November 17 2019, @02:51PM (#921247) Journal

    Hmmm, while there are certainly a political issues with Firefox, that's not what I would have pegged them as :-p
     
      - Ousting their CEO because he donated privately to the wrong side of an issue on the ballot.
     
      - Blocking the Gab plugin for non technical, non security, non legal reasons (political evangelists in Mozilla wanting to do it is not a good reason.)
     
    IMO Microsoft and Google are arguably better proponents of 'free speech' than Firefox these days, and that is a terrible statement.

    --
    В «Правде» нет известий, в «Известиях» нет правды
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2