Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday November 17 2019, @11:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the climatic-decisions dept.

The European Union's investment arm said Thursday it will stop funding fossil fuel projects from 2022 as part of a new strategy aimed at fighting climate change, in a decision environmental campaigners hailed as a "significant victory".

The European Investment Bank, the world's largest multilateral lender, had been criticised by climate groups for funding gas projects that potentially threatened the EU's commitment to the Paris climate goals.

But despite gas proving a potential sticking point, the EIB's board of directors—composed of state representatives and the European Commission—approved the new energy policy on Thursday.

"We will stop financing fossil fuels, and we will launch the most ambitious climate investment strategy of any public financial institution anywhere," EIB President Werner Hoyer said in a statement.

The EIB said the new energy plan would also "unlock" one trillion euros ($1.1 trillion) of climate action and environmentally sustainable investment over the next decade.

[...] Nineteen EU member states including France and Germany voted for the new policy, according to Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).

But three countries—Poland, Romania and Hungary—voted against, wanting more flexibility for gas funding, as did Estonia, Lithuania, Cyprus and Malta, which abstained.

Austria and Luxembourg also abstained, objecting to nuclear power being eligible for funding under the new policy, Greenpeace and the WWF said.

The European Commission said it supported the new policy, and it voted in favour.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 17 2019, @09:39PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 17 2019, @09:39PM (#921312)

    What's with the people who cling to fossil fuels in defiance of all reason and sanity? Even when fossil fuels plain cost more money and are less convenient, some still cling. I can only think it's a visceral dislike of change.

    If the words "total rebuild of infrastructure" do not ring a bell, then the process you're indulging in cannot be named "thinking" even under the most lenient of definitions.
    Do make note that no natural catastrophe and no shooting war in the history of this planet ever caused an amount of damage that would require anything even remotely approaching that.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 18 2019, @12:23AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 18 2019, @12:23AM (#921347)

    Do make note that no natural catastrophe and no shooting war in the history of this planet ever caused an amount of damage that would require anything even remotely approaching that.

    Tell that to the ca. 1945 (former) residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 18 2019, @11:20PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 18 2019, @11:20PM (#921740) Journal

      Tell that to the ca. 1945 (former) residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

      How many of the seven billion people alive today is that again? It's not even one part in a thousand.