Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Sunday November 17 2019, @07:20PM   Printer-friendly

New AI System Predicts Seizures With Near-Perfect Accuracy [Javascript required]:

For the roughly 50 million people worldwide with epilepsy, the exchange of electrical signals between cells in their brain can sometimes go haywire and cause a seizure—often with little to no warning. Two researchers at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette have developed a new AI-powered model that can predict the occurrence of seizures up to one hour before onset with 99.6 percent accuracy.

"Due to unexpected seizure times, epilepsy has a strong psychological and social effect on patients," explains Hisham Daoud, a researcher who co-developed the new model.

Detecting seizures ahead of time could greatly improve the quality of life for patients with epilepsy and provide them with enough time to take action, he says. Notably, seizures are controllable with medication in up to 70 percent of these patients.

Efficient Epileptic Seizure Prediction Based on Deep Learning$, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems (DOI: 10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2929053)

Also at Engadget


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by darkfeline on Sunday November 17 2019, @10:20PM (1 child)

    by darkfeline (1030) on Sunday November 17 2019, @10:20PM (#921315) Homepage

    Your article says:

    > A fixed parameter setting applied to all cases predicted 82% of seizures with a false prediction rate of 0.16/h.

    That's a bit different than 99.6%.

    --
    Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday November 18 2019, @02:49AM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday November 18 2019, @02:49AM (#921388)

    In 2008 I worked with the researchers further developing those algorithms... the whole thing was done on spit and good intentions, if you read in the 2003 abstract: 5 subjects. What is 5 subjects in statistical significance terms? Usually worse than nothing. The data was ridiculously onerous (HIPAA) and expensive to collect, and even more expensive to obtain independent interpretation of - which is why, after 20 years of dicking around with Lyapunov exponents, they had made so precious little progress.

    I'm glad that slapping an AI/machine learning label on it got some fresh funding into the process... maybe the new methods even work a little better than the old ones, but... I believe the real key is in collection and application of "big" data. Size matters, usually more than technique.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]