Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Monday November 18 2019, @10:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the I-reject-your-reality-... dept.

Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956__

Study: There may be no such thing as objective reality

Everyone is entitled to their own facts. That's not an opinion. At least, according to a new quantum mechanics study.

What we view as objective reality – the idea that what we can observe, measure, and prove is real and those things we cannot are theoretical or imaginary – is actually a subjective reality that we either unravel, create, or dis-obfuscate by the simple act of observation.

A smarter way of putting it can be found in the aforementioned study, "Experimental test of nonlocal causality" conducted by lead author Martin Ringbauer and an international team of physicists and researchers:

Explaining observations in terms of causes and effects is central to empirical science. However, correlations between entangled quantum particles seem to defy such an explanation. This implies that some of the fundamental assumptions of causal explanations have to give way.

Also at The Conversation


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 18 2019, @10:52PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 18 2019, @10:52PM (#921725)

    I'll see your mystical "Notions of Cause" and raise you a Second Law of Thermodynamics [wikipedia.org]. Unscramble *that* egg, friend.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 19 2019, @12:00AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 19 2019, @12:00AM (#921754)

    I don't see any concept of cause in those equations, nor anything useful that has come from examining whether the second law of thermodynamics explains "cause and effect" or not.