SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
A total of 14 companies have now entered the race to develop landers to deliver goodies to the Moon as NASA plans to send the first woman and the next man to our nearest rocky companion by 2024.
Five vendors joined the growing list on Monday, according to a media teleconference broadcast on NASA Live.
Some of the most recognizable names include Blue Origin and SpaceX, founded by tech billionaires Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk. Other lesser known corps include Ceres Robotics, geared towards AI and space robots, Tyvak Nano-Satellite Systems, focused on building tiny satellites and CubeSat products, both based in California, and the Sierra Nevada Corporation, an aerospace biz based in Nevada.
NASA regularly searches for companies to partner with for its spaceflights. None are more prestigious than crewed missions. The Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) initiative was set up for candidates to win prized contracts to help NASA with its goal of launching the first woman and man onto the Moon as part of its Artemis program.
“The CLPS initiative was designed to leverage the expertise and innovation of private industry to get to the Moon quickly,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator of the Science Mission Directorate at NASA. “As we build a steady cadence of deliveries, we’ll expand our ability to do new science on the lunar surface, develop new technologies, and support human exploration objectives.”
“Buying rides to the Moon to conduct science investigations and test new technology systems, instead of owning the delivery systems, enables NASA to do much more, sooner and for less cost, while being one of many customers on our commercial partners’ landers,” Steve Clarke, deputy associate administrator for exploration in NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, added.
[...] The CLPS contracts have a total combined value of a $2.6bn. The 14 companies in the pool will be allowed to bid for contracts, and NASA will award them based on technical capabilities, price, and schedule.
Also covered at Ars Technica: One part of NASA seems serious about fostering aerospace innovation and Space News.
(Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday November 21 2019, @02:45AM
Oh, and there's all sorts of stuff inside the methane tank (namely, the oxygen tank, and two "mini-tanks" to reliably get the engines burning during re-entry, when the main tanks are down to the sloshing dregs.) which interferes with a syringe process. A cutaway: https://www.humanmars.net/2019/08/cutaway-diagram-of-spacex-starship.html [humanmars.net]
Even without that, you'd also have to compress the original two-tank volume down to a one-tank volume, which means doubling the pressure (or going very slowly).