Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday November 20 2019, @08:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the information-wants-to-be-free dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Iran is offline and has been for three days after the government responded to widespread protests by killing the internet.

Anti-government protests started on Friday when the authorities announced a sudden 50 per cent increase in fuel prices. The protests quickly spread to over 100 cities and towns, reflecting deeper hostility to the authoritarian establishment. That establishment responded by cutting off the internet to 80 million people on Saturday night.

As a result it has been increasingly difficult to follow what is going on inside the country or how many people have been injured or killed. The government has acknowledged three deaths, but there have been at least eight reported and more are expected.

Even with the price increase Iran’s 13 cents a liter gas prices remain among the cheapest in the world, but the decision to raise the price was just one more sign of Iran’s faltering economy, in part due to continued sanctions on the country.

Iran’s response was depressingly predictable - its National Security Council instructed all ISPs to cut off internet access out of “national security interests.”

Despite the ban however, citizens have quickly discovered that Iran runs two internets: a public internet and a separate network that the government and universities are tapped into and which is still operational.

[...] In a worrying sign of what may really be going on, however, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said in an official statement on Monday that it was planning to take “decisive action” against any further protests, raising the possibility of dozens of deaths as has happened repeatedly in recent years.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by fustakrakich on Wednesday November 20 2019, @05:19PM (3 children)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Wednesday November 20 2019, @05:19PM (#922458) Journal

    He's just being another ISP with a central office and control center. It will get even more interesting when the government tells Mr. Musk to turn the thing off. We need something a bit more bulletproof, that can't be turned off by anybody, ad hoc, multiple signal paths, etc...

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21 2019, @05:25AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21 2019, @05:25AM (#922871)

    We need something a bit more bulletproof, that can't be turned off by anybody, ad hoc, multiple signal paths, etc...

    That is exactly what Skynet wants too...

  • (Score: 2) by Tokolosh on Thursday November 21 2019, @03:06PM (1 child)

    by Tokolosh (585) on Thursday November 21 2019, @03:06PM (#922993)

    I fear that a bad actor will trigger a Kessler event. Meanwhile, I trust Musk more than any government, and that is not saying much.

    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday November 21 2019, @05:14PM

      by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday November 21 2019, @05:14PM (#923061) Journal

      Musk will follow orders like everybody else. He won't take any risks.

      --
      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..